Page 3 - Editor James News Today

Nominee kagan. democrats used that term to level a broad attack against the john roberts court. >> right wing shift is pal papable. in decision after decision special interest are winning out. in decision after decision, this court bends the law to pursue ideology . >> if there is judicial activism and legislating from the bench, and it is practicing repeatedly by the roberts court . cut in only one direction, in favor of powerful corporate special and the rights of individual americans . >> joi...

There are liberal legal therorist that are suggesting that they should throw in the towel on the second amendment because the language of it is pretty clear. it is not the first amendment which has two or three things. this is explicit. and the liberal dissent was denying the reality of the wording it is hard to do. why do they do it. what james is suggesting it sipoint of deep ideology for the liberal wing of the court. liberals are national security and codling criminals . they dont believe in...

Nominee kagan. democrats used that term to level a broad attack against the john roberts court. >> right wing shift is pal papable. in decision after decision special interest are winning out. in decision after decision, this court bends the law to pursue ideology . >> if there is judicial activism and legislating from the bench, and it is practicing repeatedly by the roberts court . cut in only one direction, in favor of powerful corporate special and the rights of individual americans . >> joi...

Nominee kagan. democrats used that term to level a broad attack against the john roberts court. >> right wing shift is pal papable. in decision after decision special interest are winning out. in decision after decision, this court bends the law to pursue ideology . >> if there is judicial activism and legislating from the bench, and it is practicing repeatedly by the roberts court . cut in only one direction, in favor of powerful corporate special and the rights of individual americans . >> joi...

To do it. it is interesting. there are liberal legal therorist that are suggesting that they should throw in the towel on the second amendment because the language of it is pretty clear. it is not the first amendment which has two or three things. this is explicit. and the liberal dissent was denying the reality of the wording it is hard to do. why do they do it. what james is suggesting it sipoint of deep ideology for the liberal wing of the court. liberals are national security and codling cri...