then we have to lock at what we want to be. i think the public, i m certain the british public can rise to the challenge of the moment. we have got to deal with the economy, energy policy, make sure have got to deal with the economy, energy policy, make sure that have got to deal with the economy, energy policy, make sure that the people are more prosperous and free. the only way is conservative policies. i m a true blue conservative. policies. i m a true blue conservative. , ., policies. i m a true blue conservative. ., conservative. focus on policy and constituencies? conservative. focus on policy and constituencies? i conservative. focus on policy and constituencies? i would conservative. focus on policy and constituencies? i would like i conservative. focus on policy and constituencies? i would like to i conservative. focus on policy and | constituencies? i would like to get olitics constituencies? i would like to get politics out constituencies? i would like to get pol
so horribly wrong? it is clear this has been about the handling i has been about the handling ultimately of the chris pincher affair. it has not been about policy or about people like me not liking what he was doing. we accepted he was a brexit heseltine, a lot of intervention but out of eu. ministers have seen what they have referred to as a lack of honesty and integrity. it is better he goes now than dragging on to the privileges committee finding he had misled the house. ~ . .,, committee finding he had misled the house. ~ ., .,, , committee finding he had misled the house. ~ ., , ., house. what has the mood been like? i have been through house. what has the mood been like? i have been through a house. what has the mood been like? i have been through a lot, house. what has the mood been like? i have been through a lot, seven i i have been through a lot, seven years of being in the centre of things and i have never seen colleagues in a deeper sense of despair. people have been
about ethics and his character, that hasn t been made any better by the shock resignation of lord geidt in recent days. i think there are some who are concerned about policy. he is trying to say in recent days, since the by election defeat, focus on policy not on personality. but many of his backbenchers have concerns about the way his administration is going, and they think there is a sense of drift, there is not a real mission, policies like the rwandan flagship immigration policy haven t really come off yet, it has all been botched with a fake first plane due to take off and grounded, the whole levelling up agenda that is meant to be the flagship policy of this government, hasn t really had much flesh put on the bones which is what really is just a slogan, the critics say, and setting up the billion pound investment that would allow north and midlands communities to see really significant differences in their standard of living. fin
i think there are some who are concerned about policy. so he s trying to say in recent days, since the by election defeat, focus on policy, not on personality. well, many of his backbenchers have concerns about the way his administration is going, and they think there is a sense of drift, there is not a real mission, policies like the rwandan flagship immigration policy haven t really come off yet, it has all been botched with the first plane due to take off being grounded, another row ensuing with the european court, the whole levelling up agenda that is meant to be the flagship policy of this government hasn t really had much flesh put on the bones of is what really is just a slogan, the critics say, and certainly not the kind of billion pound investment that that would allow northern and midlands communities to see really significant differences in their standard of living. in a moment, we ll be joined by bbc one viewers for a full roundup of the day s news
dana: they are coming over. it s before they are all in their late 70s so you never know. richard: to the point that jon stewart is making, you focus on the preposition, and the stake outs at the trump tower focusing the intellect on the motorcade which is this overfocus on trump, because he had a deposition like people don t have depositions every day, is this an overfocus taking away from other things happening in the republican party? jesse: or the democratic party, with dana s excellent analogy. but i remember it to $30 million a year dividing this country, ridiculing republicans, dehumanizing fox news hosts for profit, i forgive them. it s just hypocritical, and now all of a sudden he comes out of her determinants has come we need to focus on holding the powerful accountable and focus on policy. okay, we got it. we have a rich doing the exact opposite, but he is right. the democratic party has merged with the powerful institutions