the legal, financial, political, and psychological angles to it all. we ve got it all covered we are also going to take yo back to where it all started 17 years ago, with an allege affair and figure out how we got to this point in time. and will examine the stunnin revelations this week from another investigation into trump. fulton county has another recording of a cal trump made pressuring an official to overturn the results of the 2020 election i m ayman mohyeldin, let s get started. tonight, we begin with the news everyone i talking about for better o worse. this morning, donal trump posted on social media claiming that leaks from the manhattan district attorney office indicate that he will b arrested this coming tuesday to be absolutely clear, nb news cannot confirm that claim and at this hour, there ha been no official announcemen from the manhattan da s office and no indication that charges have actually been filed against donald trump. that said, they were major
goodbye to that show. yes, no. exactly thank you very much my friend, great to see you, enjoy th best of your evening welcome to a, man over the nex two hours or bring you everything you need to kno about donald trump s statement that he expects to be arrested this coming week. the legal, financial, political, an psychological angles to it all we ve got it all covered. we r also gonna take you back t where it all started, 17 years ago, within alleged affair and to figure out how we got t this point in time. and will examine the stunning revelations this week from another investigation into trump. fulton county has another recording of alcohol trump made pressurin unofficial to overturn the results of the 2020 election i m ayman mohyeldin, let s get started. tonight, we began with the news that everyone is talking about fo better or worse. this morning, donald trump posted on socia media claiming that leaks from the manhattan district attorney s office indicate tha h
felony crime is election law violation, i i think the payof to stormy daniels again, i m a defense attorney, so take this with a grain of salt, i may have some bias but i think the theory o liability, here on election la violation, is a strange as i was six years ago, and if this that by michael cohen paying off stormy daniels, that silence that they got was benefit to the campaign that was not reported it s not the typical electio law violation which, for example, in the case of john edwards just to give you an example, h wasn t convicted - is, hey, he took a bunch o money, actual money, cash, whatever it was - material benefit - yeah, the material benefi is money it s very obvious. and this case, stephanie clifford, stormy daniels didn t give the campaign cash, she gave them her silence. that wouldn t have helped them, we did not couldn t you make that argument? yeah, if you make tha argument, and everything tha helps you is a contribution to the campaign that must b re
influence an election. there was nothing hidden there was no obligation to disclose this to an election campaign committee at all. does that legal argumen hold water for the election la violation, there is a point to be made there. and it goes back to my analysi where i compare the classi election law violation which is, i give you a bag of money, you fail to reported, it s you campaign, you are th candidate. that s the classic case. the case of stormy daniels is lot more complicated than that you have michael cohen doing the paying and then he s reimbursed and then we do we even know if trump was the person actuall signing things he has notoriously, a lot of as there were described in the godfather, buffers he has people who do his wor for him. so, joe tacopina, his attorney may have a point there but it s also a point that the prosecution can weave into a crime. so, reasonable minds here coul probably differ on whether the payments to stormy daniels wer
this to an election campaign committee. at all does that go in the rule of law? for the election la violation. it s a point to be made there, it goes back to my analysi where i compared the classic election law - where i give you a bag of money, you fail to report it. you don t. that s a classic case. the stormy daniels one is a lo more complicated than that you have michael cohen doing that, and then his reimburse do we even know if trump was the person actually signin things, he notoriously has a lot, of as they described in the godfather, buffers so, tacopina, his opponent kne may have a point there but it s also a point that the prosecution could lead into crime. so reasonable line here to differ on what the payment made to stormy daniels wer found. but by themselves, hush mone payments are not by themselves crimes weirdly enough, if you may b