he s unsure to what degree of any the parent company of the national inquirer american media inc was aware of the details but what he does say is that both he and bezos were demobbed were asked to say publicly that the original story had not relied on electronic eavesdropping or on hucking and again both men refused to do that so why it with the saudis be interested in what s on shift basis for where this is where it really does become a bit of a spy thriller because jeff bezos not only owns amazon but he also owns the washington post and who work for the washington post but the sound you journalists come out and you will remember that almost six months ago he was murdered in the sound consulate in turkey and now the washington post covered that story extensively and did d.w. a bit they made that many reports linking the saudi crown prince mohammed bin
blackmail him after threatening to publish more intimate photos and less he said the paper s reporting on him was not politically motivated and he refused. to do that ok and if so what has bases a situation visors save this weekend where gavin de becker who s worked for the amazon owner for more than twenty years has written a piece in another on another u.s. website the daily beast and he claims that his own investigation proves that the saudi arabian government had gained access to bases over his phone but he asked that he s unsure to what degree of any the parent company of the national inquirer american media inc was aware of the details but what he does say is that both he and bezos were demobbed were asked to say publicly that the original story had not relied on electronic eavesdropping or on hucking and again both men refused to do that so why with the saudis be interested in what s on shift. or this is where it
dave s step daughter had once been married to paul. this is a video from their wedding day. a messy divorce followed a few years later. so david and susan moore came into our office. reporter: susan moore is dave s wife. what did they say when they got into the office? the first thing they told us was a wiretapping incident. reporter: wiretapping? yes. reporter: dave and sue claimed paul tapped his wife s phone to spy on her during divorce negotiations and, sure enough, here are the court documents. in 1997 paul was arrested on four counts related to tapping both his wife s and in-laws phones. he pleaded guilty to one count of electronic eavesdropping, a felony. the other charges were dropped, and paul served no jail time. but the wiretapping story was just a prologue to what they were really there to talk about. who do you think is capable or responsible for actually
talk to us. the caller as it turned out was this man, dave moore, cousin of roger and gus, with a multimillion dollar spread of his own and a passion for war birds. dave s stepdaughter had once been married to paul. this is a video from their wedding day. a messy divorce followed a few days later. david and susan moore came into our office. susan moore is dave s wife. what did they say when they got into the office? the first thing they told us was a wiretapping incident. wiretapping? yes. paul tapped his wife s phone, to spy on her during divorce negotiations. sure enough, here are the court documents. in 1997, paul was arrested on four counts related to tapping both his wife s and in-laws phones. he pleaded guilty to one count of electronic eavesdropping, a felony. the other charges were dropped,
they re usually talking about some american in a looks like an average person but who uses their credential or their job to gather information and report back. and this suggests that perhaps the fbi had a person who was in fact spying on the trump campaign. paul: when you say spying, you re not talking about somebody in the trump campaign. you re talking about somebody who was trying to engage with individuals associated with the trump cam campaign, people like- yes. paul: and was do we know, seeking information, we assume on the russia probe? probably seeking information to report back to the fbi that would have been used in conjunction with what we also know is the electronic eavesdropping they were doing as well on certain trump campaign members like carter page. paul: the timing matters here as well because we re talking about 2016. we re talking about the months