pertains to vladimir putin. he allowed prudent to invade and take over crimea and that was during the obama/biden administration. that was during the obama/biden administration. he allowed russia to complete the nordstrom pipeline. he waved a major sanctions on that and that makes russia a major player in europe in terms of energy. and that s all while attacking american energy by killing new construction of the keystone pipeline. so with joe biden always, don t listen to the words even when the words are somewhat incoherent. watch the actions and see what happens and that s what i ll be watching tomorrow. sean: i m sure it has nothing to do with hunter getting money from the russian oligarchs, bristly of moscow at three and a half million dollars in why vladimir got the waiver from joe to build his pipeline and supply energy to pipelines from western europe, meanwhile shutting down our pipeline putting it literally thousands and thousands of energy sector jobs off the market, and ca
framework that put america second. bret: i saw the u.s. chamber of commerce did an analysis of jobs potentially lost from adhering to the elements of the paris accord but there were 25-plus companies that tried to lobby the administration to stay in, saying it would lose jobs. we heard that in the montage that by pulling out, it will lose jobs. what we know is there was a contraction occurring in energy sector jobs. $2.5 trillion reduction in gdp. up to 400,000 jobs by the u.s. chamber study. that is objectively measured. the discussions about our inability to export green technology, i don t think that s the case. some said this process concerns with respect to national security. we have done this before. we pulled out of the kyoto protocol and 2001. if you read in march and april
framework that put america second. bret: i saw the u.s. chamber of commerce did an analysis of jobs potentially lost from adhering to the elements of the paris accord but there were 25-plus companies that tried to lobby the administration to stay in, saying it would lose jobs. we heard that in the montage that by pulling out, it will lose jobs. what we know is there was a contraction occurring in energy sector jobs. $2.5 trillion reduction in gdp. up to 400,000 jobs by the u.s. chamber study. that is objectively measured. the discussions about our inability to export green technology, i don t think that s the case. some said this process concerns with respect to national security. we have done this before. we pulled out of the kyoto protocol and 2001. if you read in march and april