because we have somebody who did something really egregious here that really had an impact on election, and i think i have a very solid case on the law. and i think he does. and i think the facts really supported that. i agrow that it got stronger as we watched the witnesses, and i think the prosecution made a number of smart moves. maybe the smartest of all was starting with david pecker because the stakes with so clear. and i think, david, what you re pointing to is this essential question ethat trump raises for rule of law. do you treat him differently in a way that gives him a pass, or do you make sure you uphold the same standards as usual, even though he used to be the president. and that does seem now like what must have really been on alvin bragg s mind as he was weighing what to do. if i understand the situation, not to go too far back in history, but the decision to charge martha stewart. and we had all the facts there and that she lied and she
Five years ago, Gov. Newsom allocated $1.3 billion to fix the state's "pathetic" clean water crisis. But in towns like Parlier, Tooleville and Tombstone, you still can't turn on the tap and drink.
Five years ago, Gov. Newsom allocated $1.3 billion to fix the state's "pathetic" clean water crisis. But in towns like Parlier, Tooleville and Tombstone, you still can't turn on the tap and drink.
something that persuaded a lot of people to end up against claudine gay. she wrote an essay in the new york times today, and i want to share just one quote from it where she writes, at tense moments, every one of us must be more skeptical than ever of the loudest and most extreme voices in our culture. however well organized or well connected they might be, too often they are pursuing self serving agendas that should be met with more questions. how should harvard deal with these loud voices? many of these voices that were calling for her resignation have absolutely nothing to do with harvard university. and this is really the essential question, staff. how do you move forward as an institution dedicated to the pursuit of truth, but that also in the pursuit of truth s truth has to acknowledge uncertainty when other people aren t making simplistic, bad faith arguments that attempt to smear your credibility? and so, to me, the thing that is really challenging is people