opened up by keecohen, is that right? you re correct. i would be surprised if mueller or even the southern district, especially the southern district, learned anything new and in fact didn t actually clear everything cohen was going to say. in taking with governor christie said and the point you just made, what we re looking at is an attempt for corroboration. we re going to see the equivalent of an entire fbi squad probably in the new york field office devoted to following up the leads that come out of cohen. and they re already working because as we ve just said, the southern district and mueller likely already have all of this information and people are either working diligently to corroborate or working diligently in determining that it s just not there and as governor christie said, your probably not going to make the case. but let s talk about obstruction. let s talk about some of the other issues. let s talk about talking in code and how you approach a mob
the gist is this, trump s former lawyer michael cohen has told former prosecutors that he facilitated payments to two women who said that they had affairs with donald trump. and then, actually, that is it.o that is the entire story right there. paying the two women, saying for federal prosecutors was a serious crime, a crime worthy of impeachment, if not indictment. okay, but you might be wondering how exactly that is criminal. we will stipulate that everything that michael cohen has told the feds is absolutely true. assuming honesty is not a wise idea with michael cohen, but for the sake of argument let s do it in this case. everything cohen says is true, why is what he is alleging a criminal offense?? remember the facts of the story are undisputed, two women approach donald trump and threatened to ruin his career and ruin his family if he does not give them money.ch that sounds like a classic case of extortion.
mueller said i basically knew the stuff already. what does that mean? does that mean there have been wires? and he has information can conversations that we don t know anything about? that s sort of out there. he knew everything cohen had to tell him. there s a lot more witnesses that we don t know. two things because we re so obsessed with this story and trying to figure it out and translate it for people, it gets like it s like we think it s a game to figure out. i don t think any of us feel that way. this is serious, serious stuff for our democracy, but one thing that, in figuring out this, we have forgotten everything that happened last week. you know, stone, corsi, indictment of done junior, it turns out all them don junior has not been
top of it and everything is moving along is this line on page 4, the information provided by cohen is dot dot dot is consistent with and corroborated by other information obtained in the course of the investigation. what that means is, everything cohen gave him he already had it. he already had it. all the pieces are there. this summer the government seized, pursuant to warrant, terabytes of data from michael cohen, so much evidence from michael cohen, that they needed to appoint a special master to sift through it which took months. even if michael cohen ends up being the worst possible witness, someone that they just can t cooperate, that the government can t place its faith in, he may have already provided information in the form of data or other witnesses that does the government s job without cohen. right. that can corroborate what michael cohen has been saying and i guess the question is, talk about heavy redactions from
otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you re pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. i think impeachment would be totally horrible. i mean, there is no reason. he didn t collude with the russians. he didn t obstruct justice. everything cohen says has been disproved. you would only impeach him for political reasons, and the american people would revolt against that. sandra: trump s attorney rudy giuliani slamming democrats who are talking about impeachment after this week s legal set back for the president s former associates michael cohen and paul manafort. the a-time is back juan