Page 3 - Evidence Rules News Today

Over the past several years, we’ve been tracking discussions and proposed amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702. On June 7, 2022, the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of...

Expert testimony plays crucial role in trial process. Parties file motions to disqualify opposing expert witnesses. The success of motions is controlled by Federal Rules of Evidence which stipulate expert testimony meet certain standards of reliability to be admissible. ACER

We’ve chronicled the path of the 2023 amendments to Fed. R. Evid. 702 pretty much from the beginning. As we’ve discussed, those amendments reiterate…

Harris Beach attorneys Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Bradley M. Wanner and Daniel R. Strecker review and analyze key judicial holdings and legal developments in New York, the federal arena and...

On June 7, 2022, the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure approved amendments to several of the Federal Rules of Evidence—including Rule 702, which governs...

Patent litigators commonly utilize experts to explain complex and technical issues of patent invalidity, patent infringement, and damages to the jury.

Anyone serving as an expert witness should be aware that proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702, could affect the admissibility of their expert testimony in the near future.

Expert testimony is often decisive. The standard governing its admissibility is therefore critically important.

The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure unanimously approved several amendments on June 7, 2022, to clarify Federal Rule of Evidence 702—the federal standard for admissibility...

Hearsay rule: jury shouldn’t believe anybody unless they are in courtroom staring them in eyes when they say it. Lindenbaum v Realgy, Plaintiff just lost case on remand after winning appeal, Court would not accept hearsay statement by Defendant’s agent into evidence.