Low probability. So hopefully low probability of each case. I dont think there is a way of quantifying or speaking confidently which scenario constructed weapons or material is a greater risk. It depends on the situation in the place in the coming together of a lot of different events and factors. I guess i will take one more question. In the case of a bond easier for most people to a chain that is very respond [inaudible] i am sure there is Disaster Response but it says. That is what you pay taxpayer dollars to go tours, making the government can respond. The question the book deals with is the hypothetical what could be god in terms of a foreignpolicy or defense policy response. How do you get that problem through state practice . It is a bit of a different problem than a theoretical. There are ranges of plants that exist for different scenarios. You can only go so far with a theoretical in terms of writing a plan down. What the book does this go way beyond in terms of having a playb
Motivated by resentment and they feel they are put upon and there really dont understand us. Here is the guy who will stick it to them. When Hillary Clinton gave her own version and i dont think that was true 30 years ago. It has always been a part of politics but to the degree it is almost exclusively a motivating factor host bill. Good to see you burgle we will talk about your book going to pot but first we should have the full disclosure that we know each other. Longtime acquaintance says sen friends. You must have been awake for quite a while . [laughter] guest i have has and caffeine but no drugs. Host im glad you got that out there because it is situations like this i will make a lot of plot jokes. Guest i have a couple. Host very enough probable trying to hold back and tell their tasteful. But this show is from authors and not interviewers it gives the author a chance to is to the questions would assure book about . Guest i coauthored with robert white to is a meticulous researc
Opinion. The shift to the favorable side. Twenty years, 15 or 20 years from now, maybe 20 of the people in favor of legalization, now at Something Like 50 . Given the evidence we havent written why this is a bad idea. But the other thing is, and this is relevant, that as Public Opinion has softened on the subject of marijuana maybe 60 of people in favor, the Scientific Evidence is overwhelming against it. Eightynine, 90 we didnt have these Research Studies done. But now it is overwhelming with what the harm is that marijuana does and i have to believe and i want to believe that the American People are not informed of these facts so that they can make a second judgment on this wiki informed decision. Taking it to the end of the story that i think in colorado, that they will reconsider at the end of the day as they try to put this genie back in the bottle. Because they are starting to see results. I have a couple of questions about this. Who is your intended audience . Is it policymakers
Corporate funding is provided by mutual of america designing customized individual and Group Retirement products. Thats why we are your retirement company. Additional support is provided by and by the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. Thank you. From the tisch wnet studios in Lincoln Center in new york, hari sreenivasan. Sreenivasan good evening. Thanks for joining us. Isis is being blamed for a terror attack in another part of the world today, afghanistan. The president of that country says the Extremist Group was responsible for a suicide bombing that left at least 33 people dead and an estimated 100 wounded. The attack occurred outside a bank in the eastern city of jalalabad. The victims had gathered there to collect their paychecks. A spokesman for the taliban, which has been at war with the westernbacked government in afghanistan, also condemned todays attack. Well have more after the news summary. A suspected terro
Booktv. Org bookclub. President ial historian tevi troy examines the Popular Culture that american president s have partaken in over the past 200 years from Andrew Jacksons interest in attending the theater to the Reading Habits of dwight eisenhower. He speaks on a panel with jonah gold burg, William Galston and political analyst and columnist mona charen. This Panel Discussion is just under two hours. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Im chris demuth, fellow here at the Hudson Institute, and i will be moderating this afternoons session in which we will be recognizing and celebrating and discoursing upon tevi troys new book, what jefferson read, ike watched and obama tweeted 200 years of Popular Culture this the white house. With a title like that, you might expect that the book is a parade of ton and entertaining stories about president s idiosyncratic tastes in reading, theater, music, sports, movies, tv, or maybe its more than that, maybe its a study of decline [laughter] from a