Executive Privilege Doesn T News Today

threats against lawmakers, all as the insurrection was about to begin. >> theres no escape, pelosi, schumer, nadler. were coming for you. were coming in like white on rice for pelosi, nadler, schumer, even you, aoc. were coming to take you out. well pull you out by your hairs. how about that, pelosi? might as well make yourself another appointment. when i get done with you, youre going to need a shine up on top of that bald head. >> and thats not just another trump fan recording their ...

That can make a story, you know, really people passionate about it. one of them is emotion and partisan politics, and this story has both of those things. because, obviously, january 6th has been widelien condemned by -- widely condemned by most people who arent super fringe right. but because it was so awful, i think it creates a lot of passion in the democratic party and people are, obviously, really going to be following a story like this. howard: i think what paused a lot of journalists is h...

Seniors. what we are going to come out of this with, if we get all of these things, which are the progressive caucus priorities is really transformative. so thats what i was saying is i didnt want to settle for nothing, for, you know, the infrastructure bill and nothing on this build back better act. >> the priorities youve laid out, strength, paid leave, home care, making bold investments in affordable housing, affordable drug price, roadmap to citizenship, what seems like its getting thrown to...

Legitimacy of this claim based on steve bannon no longer working in the white house, which is the reason why executive privilege doesnt apply to him. but any way, well go ahead and let them talk. here they are. >> steve bannon was a private citizen before, after, and during january 6. so why is the select committee interested in steve bannon? its simple. he is a democratic party boogieman. >> this is what the majority has decided to spend its time on, holding a private citizen who wasnt even par...

Testifying today before the house judiciary committee, attorney general merrick garland pushed back on a "wall street journal" report that he told other justice department officials that he is concerned that jailing some january 6 insurrectionists could further radicalize them. >> my recollection of this is in a completely different context. that is i worry that there will be radicalization in the bureau of prisons when people are -- and this is radicalization has occurred with prison gangs, wit...

Jim crow in the 21st century is now a sinister combination of voter suppression and election subversion, and theyre targeting not just voters of colors, as i said, but every voter who doesnt vote the way they want. >> president biden today at the martin luther king memorial in washington describing crystal clear terms the unrelenting assault on voting rights across this country. one day after republican senators unanimously blocked new voting rights legislation that would combat restrictive voti...

Tweet that said something like its going to be wild, the rally they were planning. we have seen this the last five years. trump or people around trump say these things. when people press them on what exactly did that mean or this looks as if it was a tie-in to what happened january 6th they say, no, no, no. or, why would you think that? its not surprising people are looking the a or this own words. >> another reason why the executive privilege claim was tied in, executive privilege doesnt cover ...

Archives says unless a court steps in, theyre going to release these documents by november 12th. trump doesnt have much time. >> time is running out. the current white house weighed in as forcefully as it did, a i cusinge -- accusing the president of abusing his power. the presidents executive privilege doesnt cover potential criminal activity. >> thats right. >> laura, thank you for that. >> lets talk about this with cnn political analyst david gregory and senior analyst laura coates. she is a ...

>> it could embroil the president in an fbi investigation of hunter in any form because of the commingling of money through the joint account and if the fbi is investigating hunter for his past activities foreign dealings then joes they will come up as they appear to in an email form for other types of relationships so it just adds to the potential for conflict of interest in these relationships in the publics right to know what is going on as affects of the transactions hunter is involved in su...

Work. >> first of all, we know executive privilege is a qualified privilege, whoever invokes it. it can be balanced against the person who wants to hold it or it cannot be. i think in this instance theyre going to lose. this is an investigation of an insurrection. executive privilege doesnt cover that kind of behavior. thats clearly why the white house has said were not putting any executive privilege on this first batch of documents that have been requested from the national archives and that i...