how important the opening argument is. usually they say the important thing is, you deliver on what you say you re going to deliver. that s kind of critical. but beyond that, what can he do here? is his job to any exit tent to answer what we heard and generally regarded as a strong opening argument on the other side? well sure. because we know that what jurors and any human being tend to remember in a long presentation is the beginning and end. so opening statement matters. closing arguments matter as well. of course the jury is supposed to decide the case based on the evidence. these are two completely divergent stories about what happened. the prosecution says that george zimmerman profiled trayvon martin and murdered him. the defense said it was self-defense and zimmerman had no other choice. how do you expect once we get beyond this and to the witnesses how is this going to start? i would expect to hear from lay witnesses who talk about trayvon martin on the last day of his l
outrageous types of questions, and then the next question from the reporter is why are you talking so much about social issues? isn t it fair for journalists to ask the senator about his own words. the situation in syria turns deadly for more correspondents trying to cover the violent uprising there. breaking news into cnn just minutes ago. word that the two western journalists, including an american, have been killed in syria. will the dangers there choke off the flow of news from syria? plus, the sniping has already started over the movie game change even before it airs on hbo. you can actually see russia from land here in alaska. my god. what have we done? it wasn t my fault. i wasn t properly prepped. are sarah palin s people justified in going ballistic? i m howard kurtz, and this is reliable sources. the campaign debate over rick santorum and the exit tent to which he should or should not be talking about religion and social issues has quickly morphed
from? how can they ask you to do this? how can they come forward with this evidence? this junk that doesn t even work. and why wouldn t they have him a report. he is the creator of the software. why didn t he issue a report? why? he is in canada now. nobody is going to prosecute him for perjury. this is a police officer who works here. and he didn t say a word about this report until we called him and had to show you that there are no such there are no such searches of being 84 times for chloroform. the exit tent of the computer is this. three minutes worth of time, three months earlier that have nothing to do with this case. and everything to do with the
brutality and state censorship and democracy activists there, all of them young, said to me that u.s. military aid goes not just to buy weapons from the united states, but it also goes to hush money for the retired generals in the egyptian army. whether or not that s true is not the point. the point is, that there was very little trust from the beginning, even less so now. well let me go back to michael. i m going to go back and forth with your views on this subject. i m watching this reporting this, trying to get the future. i always like to get an hour ahead of what s happening and what i see here is what we call a process, back and forth. there s a communication going on here. between the military among the military to some exit tent with barak, although he s not getting the message and the people in the street. when the military goes to bed realizing they ve done nothing to mute this revolution by letting mubarak handpick his v.p. and successor, what will be their next step? wo