Thank you. The next item is constitution and possible action regarding a letter sent to supervisor farrell on december 9, 2014 mr. St. Kci. Chair i need to recuse myself from this matter thank you. So the commission demonstrated at the last meeting to request that supervisor farrell respond to the forfeiture letter the staff issued in december to determine what if any further actions to take on had matter i believe that someone representing mr. Farrell is here. Is there a representative of many farrell here . Thank you, commissioners for the opportunity to discuss this matter im sure youre aware of we submitted a detailed letter outlining the reasons why we believe strongly that forfeiture is not warranted in that matter and it is on the citys behave of the forfeiture request most noblely supervisor farrell has done absolutely nothing wrong the fcc xhublthd a two year discussion where everyone involved with this looked at hundreds of thousands of emails and they completely exaggerated
The agenda with the simplification. I came to talk about a need for responding to complaint both filed with you as well as those referred to the suspect Ordinance Task force because im involved in would both aspects of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of minutes or instruction to the shoerns on those saying there has to be a Court Lawsuit case present to
Referred to the suspect Ordinance Task force because im involved in would both aspects of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of minutes or instruction to the shoerns on those saying there has to be a Court Lawsuit case present to ethics thats not been communicated to the task force or communicated to complainants when we make a complaint i have several over
Of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of minutes or instruction to the shoerns on those saying there has to be a Court Lawsuit case present to ethics thats not been communicated to the task force or communicated to complainants when we make a complaint i have several overwhelming unanimous decisions get figuratively gotten away what is your criteria and not
Opponent therefore thats not a Campaign Contribution the fact that group was doing hit pieces on the opponent that full 200000 for that committee controlled by supervisor farrells people during the time of the campaign was gave me in all the secret activities that pisses on the opponent and expenditures on his behalf it is 2 hundred thoughts u thousands of illegal money for his campaign this is a Campaign Contribution. Any motion by anyone . I dont have is a motion. Okay. Mr. Chairman i want to make a comment before a motion or any Public Comment i do know i want to remind administrative review at commissioners of the discuss it seems there protect no way to have it would be an allornone proposition by which internally within the staff as a practice we were going to do somewhat more closely monitored and have oversight over others forfeitures it come before i understood whether this was a spreadsheet or more review and more work on the commission size with that said, we were going to l