Is to get a Ceasefire Deal in gaza before he leaves office. Something like this is going to make it far harder to achieve that because israel is currently braced for some kind of retaliation and they will be some form from hezbollah. Iran has said we still have a score to settle with you because he was the assassination of his Mouth And Ear the leader of the political wing of hamas right in the heart of tehran at an iranian government guesthouse. That is so humiliating for iran. They feel they have a score to settle. So the region is pretty three royal, volatile, tense and i dont think theres any desire by either Hezbollah Or Israel or iran to go to a full Scale War. Its damaging for everybody and you have the Gulf States who are trying to calm everybody down and trying to look a Peace Deal. Unfortunately, the two sides in gaza, hamas and the israeli government, are still too far apart. Israeli government, are still too far apart. Interesting what ou are too far apart. Interesting what
systems you use, the reason we haven t used this before, this bomb was designed in 2003 for an iraq war fight. and then it was eventually used later on in this particular fight because it met all the criteria. open space, tunnels and complexes. exploding devices, the ieds. this is part of this defensive position. so i think mcnicoleson, the commander for afghanistan said boy, i have this kind of target, what kind of target can i use it with? and the targeteteers said let s use a moab. the commander briefed his boss, and i m sure folks in the pentagon knew about it. general, what does it tell you about the target itself to actually go into i assume these tunnels would be a great danger to anybody who was doing that, to actually have people on
emissions manual. it s a book that says if this is what the target looks like, here are the kind of weapon systems you use. the reason we haven t used this bomb since 2003, and there was a predecessor to this, something called the daisy cutter, because this bomb was actually designed in 2003 for an iraq war fight. and then it was eventually used later on in this particular fight because it met all the criteria. open space, tunnels and complexes, exploding devices, the ieds that were used as part of this defensive position. so i think nick mickelson, the commander in afghanistan said boy, i ve got this kind of target. what kind of bomb can i hit it with? he probably said that a few weeks ago. his targeteers said let s use a moab. that s what he did. it took a while to do it. it seemed strategic. a lot of people are calling it that. but it s not. it s something the commander of the scene knows. but he did brief his boss and i m sure folks this the pentagon
because the mind just tells the intent you re formed to commit a crime, has to be some act in furtherance of the crime. here s the legal issue. the legal issue is that mere preparation is never enough, so there was a ton of preparation that we see. explosion devices exploding and a dry run. guns in his home. right, exploding devices. but if you don t take a substantial step towards the actual commission of the offense, it s not a crime. it s so the judge said, based upon mere preparation, there was no act in furtherance, there may have been plotting and planning but no attempt to specifically carry it out. judge said that it does not constitute a crime. that then went to the appellate court and the appellate court agreed it wasn t enough to constitute a crime. the prosecutor was in the position of, where do we go now? what they did was objected to enter into the plea deal. they entered into the plea deal because the logic is, whenever you re treateder for example, as