they hoping people aren't paying attention? because i am hard-pressed to find anyone who would say, i'd like to vote against my own power. please dilute me. >> i think it is -- this is an august election, it was expected to be low turnout, it's let's see what we can get through that's not a november. and so, -- >> that's people turned out. >> what you're saying, they didn't want to say my vote is only worth three quarters of a vote now. people have said no, you can't do that to me. >> which is why you should be a little bit careful about extrapolating too far from the vote, right? ohio is a red state. >> yeah, but ohio in the polls, it supports abortion rights by about 57%. so it came out sort of similar. >> also, a zillion people showed up to vote because they wanted to protect their right. also, because millions and millions of dollars was poured into this, and from an economic perspective, you think, my god, our system is so broken. if you think of all the places that need that money, but you
>> what you're saying, they didn't want to say my vote is only worth three quarters of a vote now. people have said no, you can't do that to me. >> which is why you should be a little bit careful about extrapolating too far from the vote, right? ohio is a red state. >> yeah, but ohio in the polls, it supports abortion rights by about 57%. so it came out sort of similar. >> also, a zillion people showed up to vote because they wanted to protect their right. also, because millions and millions of dollars was poured into this, and from an economic perspective, you think, my god, our system is so broken. if you think of all the places that need that money, but you needed it to. >> -- lifeguards, who are rescued the woman at the 59th beach in rockaway. they, i'm thinking like, they got up in the morning in, and rescuing a woman from a shark attack. who is not like the 20th or 200 things that were gonna happen. >> their beach wife cards, you never know.
bear the danger of a falling into salma's hear trap— the danger of a falling into salma's bear trap and extrapolating too much, — bear trap and extrapolating too much, the ulez thing, is there a sort _ much, the ulez thing, is there a sort of— much, the ulez thing, is there a sort of political risk area for parties _ sort of political risk area for parties here in the sense that people — parties here in the sense that people like talking about green issue. — people like talking about green issue, they like the idea of tackling _ issue, they like the idea of tackling them, but when it comes to paying _ tackling them, but when it comes to paying for— tackling them, but when it comes to paying for them, it could be a trickier— paying for them, it could be a trickier issue. does that cut through— trickier issue. does that cut through at all or do you think still it is very— through at all or do you think still it is very localised greater london type thing? i it is very localised greater london type thing?— type thing? i think political arties type thing? i think political parties have _ type thing? i think political parties have realised - type thing? i think political parties have realised theyl type thing? i think political - parties have realised they need to do as much as they can to bring people with them and there are a number of people in labour who think there should have been a compromise between the london mayor sadiq khan, keir starmer and the candidate in between the london mayor sadiq khan, keir starmer and the candidate in uxbridge. but this doesn't appear to uxbridge. but this doesn't appear to be a sort of single issue that rishi be a sort of single issue that rishi sunak wants to focus on. he is sunak wants to focus on. he is trying to broaden it out. trying to broaden it out. conservative mps have realised their conservative mps have realised their best bet is to avoid conservative best bet is to avoid conservative apathy and the 97 scenario where not apathy and the 97 who
considering leaving the state. but wait, if newsom became president, work -- where would we all moved to? poland? hungary? now, extrapolating from newsom's personal popularity and a state run by democrats, and he is. -- pretty popular there, extrapolating from that to viability for national office over joe biden is unwise. first, remember the real reason biden was the nominee in 2020. he was the only democrat still alive, the party, used to mask how radical they had become. remembered the party poked biden over bernie, buttigieg, kamala, et cetera. none were acceptable to the masses. biden was. and even with his dreadful economic record, to many, but it remains in the ring, even reassuring. wearing his banker light suits from the 1950s, and his aviator shades and his perfect pocket squares. he jogs memories of the
seriously considering leavingifw the state. but if newsom becamesom became v would we all move to spain, poland, hungary, anyonpolande? >> where would we go?ting the country would empty out. now, extrapolating from pers personal popularity in a state run by democrats, and he is pretty popular therets ,extrapolating from thatt to viability for national officeto over joe biden is unwise. first, remember the reals unwise biden was the nominee in 2020? he was the only still alive pary who the party could use to mask how radical that become. remember, the party picked biden over bernie buddha, judge kamala, etc. none wereth acceptable to the masses, but biden was. s drea and even with his dreadful economic record, too mandf y remains endearing, even reassuring. wearing his banker like suits, from the 1950s, his aviator av and his perfect pocket and res, he jogs memories of
your sources, is that an assessment shared as well by the pentagon? >> it is certainly not good for putin. vladimir putin has had a really bad few days upon a really bad year and a half. and the way the pentagon and the pentagon officials have looked at it is this has been a bad time for putin. putin has survived challenges. putin, he has been around for 27 years. he is -- we don't know at this point how this plays out. but people at the pentagon seem to be very cautious about sort of extrapolating where we go from here, where vladimir putin goes from here. it hasn't been a very good few days for either gerasimov or shoigu either. but i can't help but think that
elected a tory mayor, there was very little tactical voting at the merrimack level. but lower down, at counsellor level there was tactical voting in some of the words. if it switches back to that at the general election, i think the tories are in serious trouble. the other point is a lot of the discussion about coalitions is based on extrapolating from these results in england only. we have no guesstimates about what is going on in scotland at the moment. the lib dems do better in local council elections and they have clearly ta ken local council elections and they have clearly taken in areas where they were challenging the tories, they were challenging the tories, they have taken vote away from labour. we saw that last week. that is likely to reverse come in a general election because they are not likely to be challenging as much
most people that apply for asylum will not be successful. so they're sending the message. but apparently the message isn't understood at the white house and the consequences don't match the words. so the border officials here don't believe anything will change as we get closer and closer to the may 11th date. neil? >> neil: thanks. let me emphasize something that we point out. we get our numbers to the u.s. border patrol. they answer to the secretary of homeland security. the fact of the matter that is over the last ten days, we've seen 73,000 migrants cross the southern border. that's the last ten days. extrapolating on this, we have seen more than 22,000 people apprehended in just the last 72 hours. we can take that down. this is coming in now. we've had better than 16,895 got-aways. so that puts this in dramatic perspective. these are numbers coming in in just the last few minutes.
a. >> ainsley: how safe are our banks and who is to blame for this. >> the party to blame for this is the u.s. federal reserve which for 20 years has been playing this game of playing god. unfortunately, they have been doing it with the fat finger. playing god for financial system with a fat finger which means they haven't done a great job of balancing inflation and unemployment. that means they have had to have these jerk responses in one direction or another. what happens is when they raised interest rates pretty sharply in the last year and a half or two what happened caused silicon valley bank to fail. what's worth noting the silicon valley bank different than other banks took risks they shouldn't have taken. concentrated base of technology companies as client base. the idea of extrapolating that to the rest of the banking system is a big overstatement. sort ever fear-mongering pushed by silicon valley fen temperature capitalists over the weekend to earn a special bailout. that's exactly what they got which is i refer to as crony
but you could start extrapolating from this. you say something is a company we don't like, will go after you and take things away. >> well, neil, yes, that is true but as they impact their shareholders. a little different. corporate america for years. and companies go out there on a hot, hot political issue that doesn't affect shareholders. sex education flaw to sex education. it wasn't like mislabeled that. and disney, more bizarre spectacle. >> neil: quickly, charlie, is this a signal he's not running for presidency? this is a popular issue. >> i talked to some trump people today and as one of them put it, i bet my house he runs here they think he is running here they think they can beat him and