john travolta. if he indicates he s unwilling to go forward jamie: to testify a second time. because that ended in a mistrial and the prosecutors have to start from scratch and if they don t have travolta to come in and subject himself to cross-examination, well, it makes the case probably in a practical sense impossible to prove, depending upon what sort of forensic evidence might or might not exist but from a constitutional sense it makes the case impossible to prove because the defendants will say hey, unless he gets on the stand all rights to confrontation are being violated. jamie: same parameters if the u.s. authorities decided they wanted to pursue a case. rite, and that s another interesting aspect. back in 09 the fbi was involved in this case, the fbi actively investigated this case, extraterritorial jurisdiction has been used more aggressively in the united states and the standards are pretty straightforward. you either have to be a crime affecting a u.s. citizen