Page 11 - Fact Finding News Today

Tonight on all in. A president of the United States has to have immunity. And the Supreme Court is going to be really good at it. The supreme will take Donald Trumps immunity case. This is a momentous Decision Just to hear this case tonight Rachel Maddow and lawrence on the Supreme Court their delayed decision, and what it means for justice. Plus, lisa rooney, and Kristy Greenberg on how we got here and david claw from the new political reality for an electorate that has stopped trump before. Wh...

Trumps community case. This is a momentous Decision Just to hear this case. Tonight, rachel and Lawrence Odonnell on the Supreme Court with their delayed decision and what it means for justice. Lisa rubin and kristi on how we got here. The new political reality for an electorate that has stopped trump before. All in starts now. Good evening from new york. Im chris hayes. The right wing dominated the Supreme Court and gave donald trump a gift. The biggest possible gift anyone could give him. The ...

Interference charges. Now, i will remind you, the court could have just affirmed the u. S. District courts ruling that, no, a president ial does not have absolute immunity. But that was not the decision tonight. And while hearing the case does not mean that ultimately they will rule in trumps favor, the highest court in the land just gave trump something that he has been aggressively fighting for, time. The Oral Arguments in the case have been set for the week of april 22nd, nearly two months fr...

Power. You somehow reached in there and told the republicans you absolutely must not do it. A little taste of republicans, in the year 2024. And the senators also going to be joining, us talking about the same could port he might be average that the Supreme Court is taking the trump appeal. I am not i tried to make that clear last. Night not outraged by. Bit saving my outrage for the opinion if it is an outrageous opinion. But, i do find It Outrageous that Clarence Thomas has not recused himself...

text in a dramatic departure from previous amendments sought to bring justice to millions of formerly enslaved black americans and to insure that the formerly elected officials who waged war against the united states would not be allowed to serve in elected office again. that is the purpose of section 3. now, knowing all that, at issue today before the court were some key questions. one, do states have the right to enforce section 3 or can only congress do that? two, did the drafters i...

suggest that. >> is there any evidence to suggest that the presidency was what they were focused on? >> there is some evidence of that. there were people saying we dont want jefferson davis to be elected president and there was also one of the drafts of section 3 specifically mentioned the presidency and the vice president. >> but it wasnt the final enactment. >> right. it wasnt the final enactment, but it shows there was some concern about some people about confederate insurrectionist...

alleged role in the january 6th insurrection. well all be able to listen live tomorrow morning. let me make it easy to follow the conversation tomorrow. youve been hearing a lot about the 14th amendment. its at the center of the case. it has five sections. of the five, you may only really know section one, the one about due process, laws, that one. its the other white meat, section three. thats the one thats important, the so-called insurrectionist band. at its core it says, you cant h...

that argument. >> there is some evidence to suggest that. >> any evidence to suggest the presidency was what they were focused on? >> there is some evidence of that. people saying we dont want jefferson davis to be elected president and one of the drafts of section three specifically mentioned the presidency and vice presidency. >> it wasnt the final inaction. >> it wasnt final but there was concern by some people about con federal insurrectionists ascendsing to the presidency. we didn...

repercussions for the election this year and also for the future of american democracy. it is arguably the most important election case to reach the supreme court since bush v gore nearly a quarter century ago. the question before the court is pretty simple actually. does section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars, quote, an officer of the united states who, quote, engaged in insurrection from holding public office actually apply to the man who incited the january 6th riot, who tried ...

the case that can change the course of the election. nine justices are ironing their robes, as we speak. tonight on laura coates live. and just a few short hours from now, the supreme court of the united states will hear arguments in a historic effort to ban former president trump on the ballot for his alleged role in the january six insurrection. well be able to listen i tomorrow morning. let me make it easy for you to follow their conversation tomorrow. youve been hearing a lot about...