, the president , by the way, compares with a hot war, look will not. We will have bread hot war, as in ukraine , in fact, we are just like, uh, you can start with you, look. Here it seems to me epoch e, also for many people. Im not my opinion. Now i say the era of large farms. She never passed. In the early nineties, we had such a story that everyone suddenly wanted to become farmers. Lets give away latifundia to those who have a small piece, sell somewhere there, and in the end it turned out that everyone up to the west lives a little, otherwise. Yes, perhaps this is a private trader who has some kind of land, but this is essentially enterprise, and we are now talking about the fact that this collective farm system that existed in the soviet union is not unique. Yes, it may be slightly different in terms of the level of ownership, but one person has two hectares of land to feed himself with what you can, but if you earn money by business. Probably because , well, i was with you for e
As the head of the labor faction, my position was strong and firm, and even in the discussion of determining the wages of working workers and even as an observer of the hand rights council, which has recently been mentioned in many of the socalled notes 12 and 20, generally my opinions we are discussing countering and determining the interests of employees and workers forms. Unfortunately, we are faced with an organization that administers the employment office, the failure of the emotional precision that the parliament does not enter into expert negotiations, and with a Social Security organization and rehabilitation funds. In the early 1960s, going to those funds, whatever they have, they brought managers and ministers into that fund, and their own rules govern a fund there. Social security, which belongs to the poor unfortunate workers, here i come, here we hit the workers, it is completely antiviolent according to the comparison with we deal with the fundamentals of the constitutio
Periods of different forms, pointed, bluntly finite. Uh, its just that all the fields are littered with bullets. What kind of battles are there . Well , i can say for sure, of course, i cant, but the fact that the battles were going on and there were a lot of them. Thats for sure. Once upon a time there was a very beautiful church. We can see the remains of the foundation of this church. Here they are stones, but evil people during the soviet era, they burned it and for a long time our circle was vacant with great joy was the pledge of this. Cross on the site of the burned church and at first they hoped that another church would be restored here, but a decision was made. Eh, after all, in another part to build a church, but in memory of the history of the past, this cross stands here. All of them , indifferent people, always come with reverence and worship the mother of god and this cross , this holy place. Here is such a memory. And even churches, since this church was located on the
[inaudible]. Thank you, ken. [laughter]. Its, its a real pleasure to be here this morning, and thanks to weda for organizing this very, very timely session on nafta 2. 0. As someone who has been involved in the trade, war is too strong, debate is too tame, the vigorous trade discussions weve had in washington over the last 20 years, were certainly at, even in scope of those discussions were at an unprecedented moment right now awaiting to see the unrolling of the adminstations new trade strategy. We have been, weve heard a lot from the president when he was a candidate, when he was president elect. Since becoming president weve heard a lot about mexico. We heard a lot about mexicans. Weve heard a lot about nafta. We heard a lot about china. We heard a lot about it. Pp. A lot of things are going to be ripped up. A lot things will be done away with. A lot of things will be changed, yet we have little in the way of actual specifics that have come out. The president s trade team, some of t
Thank you, ken. [laughter] its, its a real pleasure to be here this morning, and thanks to weda for organizing this very, very timely session on nafta 2. 0. As someone who has been involved in the trade, war is too strong, debate is too tame, the vigorous trade discussions weve had in washington over the last 20 years, were certainly at, even in scope of those discussions were at an unprecedented moment right now awaiting to see the unrolling of the administrations new trade strategy. We have been, weve heard a lot from the president when he was a candidate, when he was president elect. Since becoming president weve heard a lot about mexico. We heard a lot about mexicans. Weve heard a lot about nafta. We heard a lot about china. We heard a lot about it. A lot of things are going to be ripped up. A lot things will be done away with. A lot of things will be changed, yet we have little in the way of actual specifics that have come out. The president s trade team, some of them have been na