didn't try to talk out of both sides of the mouth. i wish we saw republican governors standing up and saying not no way am i going to put my brand on donald? trump if we think further than just november, which is going to take further than november to fix this republican party to get us back on track. we would all stand up against donald trump. i think history is going to reward those who were all in against donald trump and his ridiculous nature's, i said a minute ago, this is a ponzi scheme failing. it's falling apart, it's financially falling apart. messaging is falling apart donald trump looks week. when you watch him come out and act like a two-year-old child, pre and post trial in his statements, he just is weak de a loosening of the grip that he has on the party absolutely. >> and i think i think that full room of republicans that voted in favor of the funding bill today they want an excuse to move away from donald trump. >> they want some air cover. i hear from folks in the legislature here in georgia here from it, from folks in congress. these are, these are good wholesome folks that want
we will get the numbers in a moment. you referenced ukraine. 101 republicans, 210 democrats voted in favor. there was one republican from pennsylvania, representative dan mezer who voted present. all democrats in the house on the floor there voted in favor of ukraine aid. is this notable, we are getting a readout that speaker johnson, leader scalise, emmer, all voted for ukraine aid. the fourth member of gop leadership, elise stefanik voted against. so 3 to 1 in favor of ukraine aid and voting for the passage of that bill, all but stefanik who voted against that. the color has been a couple of dozen democrats there on the left of the screen waving small ukrainian flags on the floor. the chair then had to remind them that is a violation of
because i'm the same news programs on sling for less. you mean you're me but for less money, a lot less? i'm all your favor. news programs and more on sling starting at just $40 a month. everything great about me, but for less money, which makes me greater than you think it's the same news for less, starting at $40 a month at fisher investments, we may look like other money managers, but we're different. and how so? >> we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in our client's best interests. >> so we don't sell any commission-based products, then how do you make money? >> we have a simple management fee structured, so we do better when our clients do your clients really come first then. >> yes, we make them a top priority by getting to know their finances, family, health lifestyle, and more. wow maybe we are different at fisher investments were clearly different i brought in a chore max protein with 30 grams of protein. >> those who tried me felt more energy and just two weeks here i'll take that. >> i'm sure not to protein 30
they ran out of strikes. >> i believe so because it's very close to the end and they were trying to remove her for cause. i believe so, but it was very chaotic. that's all happened really quickly, but i think that was part of the issue. >> if i were in that situation and i had two strikes left, i'm like saving my strikes for the worst of the worst. >> and that's a big disadvantage the way they did this jury selection, because you can't see all the dented apples at once. so you don't know if tomorrow is going to be worse than today? i would probably live with her too because people he isn't people's cup of tea. he he knows that he's not trying to curry favor with anyone. i mean, that's sort of his, you'd think he would behave a little bit more with a judge, but he doesn't because he is who he is. >> what on that note, paul, i gotta ask you about the fact that the assistant district attorney, josh steinglass is saying that he is not going to let the defense know ahead of time which witnesses are going to be brought once the trial starts is presumably that will happen next week. and when
including attacking jurors? >> yes. so the judge is absolutely right to worry about in appeal. trump is going to file an appeal if he is convicted no matter what, and trial judges generally have a lot of discretion over how to run their trials. so the thumb on the scale is going to be in favor of the judge but that doesn't give them an unlimited blank check. i think today generally was a good day. they took eight steps forward and only two back. that is a good day in the trump trial world because they are trying to find 12 people in the world in manhattan who don't have strong feelings about donald trump. that is like trying to find a non-new york jets fan in new york. but it looks like the judge has managed to do it. the problem is, you have got donald trump testing the judge at every turn, basically with the judges issuing a gag order. trump said, i dare you to do
all you had to do was when israel was begging the people, move to the south who couldn't open up the border, who wouldn't go give them food, get them out and then all of a sudden israel would have done the world the favor of getting rid of hamas and weeks. but no, why is america not doing this? >> i don't know. and there you go. look, they're all running to the south. >> they're all running to the south. you know, they all want to get out of here. >> there's there. it strikes me that it strikes me, rabbi, that there is always a great of sympathy expressed in certain quarters for the plight of the palestinian people. >> a lot of that sympathy for the palestinian people and outrage at what is doing expressed by the the, for instance, by other countries in the region. but you rightly point out, nobody has said come us, we'll take nobody, nobody. by the way, people don't know what's really going on in
zooming out here. a strike inside of iran. what is the significance of that well for israel, it would re-establish deterrence, which is what iran said last weekend. >> they had established in their favor the ability to strike back with the intent to deter israel from striking them. israel has relied historically in this region that is that is oftentimes very hostile to its existence iran for example, denies the existence of the israeli state. it is an existential threat to israel and deterrence is the way that israel has deemed is the d only effective way to put off a potential aggressive in the region. so if they have struck tonight, it will be an effort to reset that deterrence. now the iranian foreign minister was very clear if there's any sort of strike
now, the us position, as you say, has long been known. it argues that granting palestine full status would be premature, that it should not come ahead of a negotiated settlement, a bilateral agreement between palestine and israel. but nonetheless, although that was the us position, it was clear that it did not want, if it could possibly avoid it, to have to do what it did today. there are reports of pretty intense lobbying behind the scenes. the us would have liked to have got this vote delayed or even better had other members come on board to help defeat it. but in the end, what's remarkable is 12 of the 15 members of the security council voted in favor, including some pretty key us allies — japan, south korea and france. and that forced the us ambassador robert wood, to raise that hand, issuing the veto and killing the proposal. to raise that hand, issuing
impartial. this was a potential juror who said they were watching fox news mostly reading "the wall street journal" as well. at that moment in which she talked about watching fox news, he looked in her direction, he was interested in hearing more of her answers. he's interested in those people who seem to be more politically ambiguous. jurors more politically ambiguous, passing notes for instance to his attorney todd blanche and those moments in which he feels as if possibly maybe a juror would be more in their favor than not. seat number 14 is a male and talked about volunteering for get out the vote for the democratic party during the clinton campaign, and attending a women's march as well. i'm told in that moment the former president kind of perked up looking in the direction of this potential juror as well. and there was another interesting potential juror, a woman who says her father is a life long friend of governor chris christie in this moment, i'm told, the former president kind of smiled, smirked, i should say, and talking about
some of them are personal. i think that we are showing that tomorrow r0 this is about putting america first. it's about putting democracy first. i think they need to put their personal concerns aside and do what's right for the american people. and i've said it's this morning and i set it to speaker johnson last night and reminded him again this afternoon, the world is watching and these days that we've had started thing with iran attacking israel. and of course october 7, now leading to us voting on these packages, the world is watching. this is going to be in history books and i think that history is going to look very kindly upon those members of this body as well as our speaker who stepped up and did the right thing at the right time. >> in quickly before i let you go, you have said that you would be in favor of consequences, repercussions for mike johnson's detractors, those specifically on the rules committee who multiple times have blocked rules supported by the speaker who are threatening the others who are maybe