Page 13 - Fawning News Today

♪theres a me no one knows ♪waiting to be set free so, whats the empty suitcase for? the grand prize trophy ♪i was born to be somebody >> laura: at sam for the last bite. the mainstream media is fawning over the more than 85 woman elected to congress. that is kind of a cool thing. they are forgetting a republican who is also making a first.

Different if the hearing had f been held inside to see at a new studio. rising stars in thebe democratic party have been the subject of seemingly endless fawning media coverage and we say fawning, we mean fawning. candidates running are involved in pretty serious scandals. something you probably didnt read and then play discussion magazine profile of them. we will bring you up-to-date. first the case of andrew gillum, the socialist democrat running for governor in florida, he was the mayor of t ...

Maybe that would have been different if the hearing had been held inside to see at a new studio. rising stars in the democratic party have been the subject of seemingly endless fawning media coverage and we say fawning, we mean fawning. canada running -- candidates rue involved in pretty serious scandals. something you probably didnt read and then play discussion magazine profile of them. we will bring you up-to-date. first the case of andrew gillum, the socialist democrat running for governor i...

Its not about a lie detector. its about the "new york times" claiming this is a highly placed individual where high-level people in the white house agree with with the president is doing. if they disagree, they do it in the a patriotic way. judge jeanine: there is always going to be back and forth. thats the way you run anything. but the significant part of it to me is there is all this fawning over john mccain. wonderful war hero. why is that so part a part of this? what does it tell you? but l...

Its not about a lie detector. its about the "new york times" claiming this is a highly placed individual where high-level people in the white house agree with with the president is doing. if they disagree, they do it in the a patriotic way. judge jeanine: there is always going to be back and forth. thats the way you run anything. but the significant part of it to me is there is all this fawning over john mccain. wonderful war hero. why is that so part a part of this? what does it tell you? but l...

Its not about a lie detector. its about the "new york times" claiming this is a highly placed individual where high-level people in the white house agree with with the president is doing. if they disagree, they do it in the a patriotic way. judge jeanine: there is always going to be back and forth. thats the way you run anything. but the significant part of it to me is there is all this fawning over john mccain. wonderful war hero. why is that so part a part of this? what does it tell you? but l...

Judges who would want the job. and to add to that, kavanaugh, chuck, was really fawning over the president when he accepted the nomination. lets play that sound bite. >> throughout this process, i have witnessed firsthand your appreciation for the vital role of the american judiciary. no president has ever consulted more widely or talked with more people for more backgrounds to seek input about a supreme court nomination. mr. president, i am grateful to you and i am humbled by your confidence in...

This and it is unsettling. the fact the president is an unindicted co-conspirator is highly unsettling. i still come back to my original point. that justices of the supreme court appointed for life often and early establish their independence from whoever appointed they will. precedent matters a lot here. and remember the earlier decisions that i talked about where justices appointed by the very president under fire, sided against anymore both cases. so yeah. fawning, absolutely. unsettling, you...

Judges who would want the job. and to add to that, kavanagh, chuck, was really fawning over the president when he accepted the nomination. lets play that sound bite. >> throughout this process, i have witnessed firsthand your appreciation for the vital role of the american judiciary. no president has ever consulted more widely or talked with more people for more backgrounds to seek input about a supreme court nomination. mr. president, i am grateful to you and im humbled by your confidence in me...

My view, is an unindicted coconspirator is highly unsettling. i still sort of come back to my original point, which is is that justices of the supreme court appointed for life often and early establish their independence from whoever appointed them. precedent matters a lot here. and remember those earlier decisions that i talked about where justices appointed by the very president under fire sided against him in both cases. so yeah, fawning absolutely. unsettling, you bet. but i still have a lot...