Page 63 - Fee Structure News Today

Its without recommendation. Is that correct . No. You could put it out with recommendation or without recommendation. Oh im sorry. Thats our advice. When a ceqa appeal is pending but not other land use appeals. Okay. So this appeal is not a due process appeal . Can you explain a little bit . Sure. The reason for the advice on ceqa appeals is has nothing to do with due process issue. Its whether the board can take approval actions during the appeal process. And for the appeal and due process appe...

Part of what i do for the Grassroots Organization i called them on the phone to get an update on the organization and to keep them you know to get them to fund and things like that. And to quite often i get comments and frustration with the sf program, and the funding is not there and the part of the solar panels on there on the roof and so i would say whatever it takes lets accelerate this as quickly as possible as issuing this funtding because in the beginning the changes being made is positiv...

Have a shadow in open square. Only one of them shadow that. The adequacy of eir is before you. You have to find that the eir complies. Whats happening here is interesting. The report is dated may 8th. 1 day after you deny the appeal and certify the eir, the source of the new information that there are in fact feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would reduce that Significant Impact of shadowing. You have to contend with the fact that you have an eir that ignore that issue, actually ...

And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be conversation and there is going to be labor components and we did get it back on how we will let that out and th...

The immediate vicinity of this building. Thank you. Thank you. Okay colleagues the item is in the hands of the committee. So colleagues given what i suggested before let me suggest a couple of approaches. If it were up to me i would love to send this out at the 425foot mark which is between where the two parties are and i am happy to support that with recommendation. Assuming youre not comfortable with that send it out without recommendation today and encourage the parties between the next 24 ho...

Pilot program. Will we begin to analyze that and then no longer make those references and just call it a program and a budget item of the puc . Well, it does not address that specifically, and my hope is that as we move towards a customer, you know, a San Francisco customer, based program, that, that that will have the effect of terminating it. And i dont know if we ever need to make a formal declaration i think that if we are starting with our own customer its changes character and i think that...

Again all of the heights are this height limit we believe is keeping with the overall design character and the heights in the immediate vicinity of this building. Thank you. Thank you. Okay colleagues the item is in the hands of the committee. So colleagues given what i suggested before let me suggest a couple of approaches. If it were up to me i would love to send this out at the 425foot mark which is between where the two parties are and i am happy to support that with recommendation. Assuming...

We are not there, i will be supporting the supervisor and her motion. I think i was a little bit optimistic and i do hope that maybe some day we can resolve the issues around the Mexican Museum. Thank you, president chiu. Supervisor campos . Thank you mr. President. Again, i want to thank all the parties that have been working on this project. Its also good to see former supervisor ma her in the building. I too have been hopeful and optimistic in seeing if it was possible for the parties here to...

Seeing if it was possible for the parties here to come to an understanding that would address the concerns that have been raised around shadows and still allow the project to move forward. I know that discussions have been had, im not sure exactly how different people would characterize where the discussions are at this point. I dont know if its as close as maybe some of us hope it would be, but in any event, we are where we are and i think its unfortunate that we have not been able to resolve t...

It steps up here and thousand feet at the Transit Center so again all of the heights are this height limit we believe is keeping with the overall design character and the heights in the immediate vicinity of this building. Thank you. Thank you. Okay colleagues the item is in the hands of the committee. So colleagues given what i suggested before let me suggest a couple of approaches. If it were up to me i would love to send this out at the 425foot mark which is between where the two parties are ...