Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
colluding against president found evidence that president trump to ensure they get him. trump intimidated, threatened, and they re blowing through every procedure to ensure they and tampered with perspective get him in time.ro so what happened today? and actual witnesses in the impeachment inquiry. while we were stuck here, the correct? yes. inspector general report, the and mr. goldman, it is a review of applications of the federal crime to intimidate or toim seek to intimidate any fbi crossfire hurricane investigation. here are some of the top witness appearing before congress. is that right?nt findings. the fbi included inaccurate yes there is a little bit information in the carter page more to it, but that s the gist of it, yes. mr. goldman, am i correct fisa application. that president trump publicly failed to include exculpatory attacked witnesses before, information. after, and even during their therm fbi chose to defensively testimony? that is correct. brief candidate