European security is it going to be difficult to persuade people here in this country that that is the truth when media in this country continues he tells us he too is defensive against your threats russia is the us. The problem with the United Kingdom is that for recent 3300 years we are unique. Or revelry to each other i think that it is that it wants to fish from that sense about the people in this country the establishment even in the highest circles of the still do believe that russia is a competitor and think they are in a competition for influence and of course of these does not contribute to make a relationship better especially in the last peter the time when we see that but he didnt i due to internal developments break as it pulls worlds cortlandt is. Going to miss cortlandt its influence on international air. Is declining purpose it does not play such at all as in the past of course. Many years ago and when people in london see that russia. Build up its influence in the worl
We reached out to our russian colleagues and say please provide us the data and we can finish that case what we then saw was that data where deleted and rolled out of where they lead it so we could not anymore finish finish our cases so therefore it is almost impossible now to really go to the to to every case and to find out whether this outlet was innocent or not and i think this was the russians fold in all our folds and therefore we are really disappointed about about that point nevertheless we want to make sure that stilled to day to day to not lets up or take that and therefore with from our point of view the neutral outlets is a good way of of exonerate those that were not part of the cheats and were not part of any deletions and therefore for our point of view its a good decision. Ok thank you. Heres a question and then how or behind you. This comes the b. B. C. Jonathan surely the most robust punishment would have been a blanket ban i just wondered how close so if you discuss
There good evening and thanks for joining us here on r. T. International. Rusher is being kicked out of all International Sporting events for the next 4 years punishment so says the World Antidoping Agency for moscow tampering with a key database of test results from russian athletes duplicate was that water press conference in those up. What are officials announcing a unilateral decision over a 4 year ban on russia taking part in major sporting events during that period meaning that russian athletes wont be able to compete and the ban over russia nor will they be able to fly the russian flag at those major events those major events could include tokyo 2020 and also the world athletics championships is also suggestion that this could impact the football world cup in 2022 now those sanctions go much further than that it means that russia wont be able to host nor be able to bid for any major sporting events during that 4 year period russian officials wont be able to go in an official cap
Thanks for joining us this. Pressure is being kicked out of all International Sporting events for the next 4 years punishment says the World Antidoping Agency for tampering with a key database of test results from russian athletes. Press conference in lhasa. What are officials announcing a unilateral decision over a 4 year ban on russia taking part in major sporting events during that period meaning that russian athletes wont be able to compete and the ban over russia nor will they be able to fly the russian flag at those major events those major events could include tokyo 2020 and also the world athletics championships is also suggestion that this could impact the football world cup in 2022 russia wont be able to host nor be able to bid for any major sporting events during that 4 year period russian officials wont be able to go in an official capacity to those games nor will officials in russia be able to sit on the boards of major sporting committees all boards during that time when
A position that both sides want to pin all of their trade hopes on was certainly for the u. S. I think hong kong was a very important card to play and it was a way for trying to exert maximum leverage either sign phase one of the deal or i will sign off on the legislation that obviously has not worked and in fact backfired on china because china is clearly trying to separate the 2 issues one saying this is a political move and were talking trade these are 2 separate issues and we should try to keep them separate and so thats why they sanction the u. S. Vessels which clearly doesnt really have any effect at all whether no effect on trade no effect on Economic Activities the u. S. Ports and vessels can clearly dock anywhere else in the philippines singapore australia anywhere else so really has no effect is more so a reputational thing so no going back to phase one of this trade deal where we seem to be looking like were further away from it what happens to businesses and consumers if ph