Page 2 - Final Written News Today

The USPTO Director is under no obligation to institute petitions for inter partes review, even if a petition technically meets all of the requirements for institution. There are two...

The following arguments will be available to the public live, both in-person and through online audio streaming. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at:...

The lecturer, for over two decades, has been involved in a legal battle against the University of Uyo for the unlawful termination of his teaching appointment in 2002.

The availability of post-grant proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has changed the face of patent litigation.

Petitioner Allowed to Proceed in “Understudy Role” - In American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Neo Wireless, LLC, IPR2023-0791 (P.T.A.B. March 30, 2023), American Honda Motor...

In October, the PTAB cancelled 694 (76.60%) instituted claims across 61 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions, including decisions issued following remand from the Federal Circuit. After review, 195...

Dyk, J. The Court affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision finding that while "[t]he Board issued its Final Written Decision after the statutory deadline...

Last week marked the first time that USPTO Director Vidal acted under the Revised Interim Director Review Process to order a Delegated Rehearing Panel...

Last week marked the first time that USPTO Director Vidal acted under the Revised Interim Director Review Process to order a Delegated Rehearing Panel to review a decision denying...

In July, the PTAB cancelled 366 (76.89%) instituted claims across 31 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions, including decisions issued following remand from the Federal Circuit.