this was the worst we ve seen. more factual mistakes have been made. i have a remedy for this. let cnn replay every one of the mistakes they made; he carried an illegal gun over tate lines, he had no business being in kenosha, he had no relatives. let them put on the air the people who made those misstatements, let them either justify them or apologize. let there be some accountability. i are have for years said that jeffrey toobin and others at cnn who make so many mistakes, so many false statements, they should have those played back after they ve been proved false the same with scarborough, with don lemon. there has to be accountability. now, i m a first amendment supporter, so i m reluctant to encourage lawsuits although i m suing cnn for doctoring a tape of what i said in front of the senate. the first amendment doesn t protect against malicious
violence is protected, there is obviously going to be a question of where, along that spectrum, can you say the law should step in or the first amendment doesn t protect you? and that s what this case, i think, is interestingly going to be about which is what is that line? you have to understand the nature of internet communication, and how much that changes the nature of incitements. no matter what the verdict is, you have already won because richard spencer said was financially crippling. heinbach has quit white supremacy, at least officially. so has jeff scoop. they don t hold public rallies, anymore. whatever they might be doing behind the scenes, they are not able to get numbers in public. what do you think about that? people need to really understand that that this is real, that it s out there. that it allows people from all over the country and the world to organize in ways that were previously impossible. and that s a real and present danger. reporter: tanisha says despit
the discord post pictures it shows a tractor running people over. and it s called the protestor digester. look. there is many, many posts in this case about running over people with cars prior to the car attack on august 12th. but that one, to me, was like i can t get it out of my head. hundreds of fascists on all sides. if you are saying organize violence on the one hand is not protected by the first amendment. but speech that does talk about violence is protected, there is obviously going to be a question of where, along that spectrum, can you say the law should step in or the first amendment doesn t protect you? and that s what this case, i think, is interestingly going to be about which is what is that line? you have to understand the nature of internet communication, and how much that changes the nature of incitements. no matter what the verdict is, you have already won because richard spencer said was financially crippling. heinbach has quit white supremacy, at least official
in the republican mainstream. they acknowledge north carolina representative mike clampitt. they happen to all be republicans in this report. over 400 people signed up for membership or newsletters that use military or political campaign email addresses. there is a right to association in this country, but there s also concern some of these groups are directly linked to violence. there is a right of association, but there is no right to incite violence. you re right. we have to be very careful to protect people s first amendment right to say what they will, to associate with whom they would, but we draw the line, and the first amendment doesn t preclude us from doing so, that you cannot conspire to commit crimes. you cannot incite an i m nant attack on others. so there are limits, and also
if donald trump was the flat formed completely never to be allowed back on, what do these think tank companies like twitter or facebook in the future? this isn t just a warning to me, this is a warning to america that all of us are at risk. the first amendment doesn t protect you here because this is a private company. i get that. that is true but the fact of the matter is this is not in alignment with the spirit of the first amendment which is having a debate and public domain, these companies are censoring some voices and others a lot more than they should. jillian: you are running the republican primary in nevada. this is one of the issues in the list of many you are hoping to tackle. absolutely.