Please waive to the system that you have been unmuted. Do we have any comments for this item . There are no callers in the queue. Chair ronen okay. Thank you very much so much. Then if i could make a motion to send this item forward with positive recommendation. Can we please take a roll call vote on that motion . [roll call vote] the motion passes without objection. Chair ronen thank you so much. Any other items on the agenda . Clerk that completes the agenda for today. Chair ronen thank you. Have a good day everyone. See you soon. Welcome to the San Francisco Planning Commission remote hearing for september 24, 2020. February 25, the mayor de claurd a local state of emergency for covid19 and being youd emergency orders making it possible to hold hearings remotely. By april 3, 2020 the Planning Commission received authorization to reconvene remotely through the shelter in place. This is our 23rd remote hearing. It requires everyones attention and your patience. If you are not speaking
Welcome to the San Francisco Planning Commission remote hearing for september 24, 2020. February 25, the mayor de claurd a local state of emergency for covid19 and being youd emergency orders making it possible to hold hearings remotely. By april 3, 2020 the Planning Commission received authorization to reconvene remotely through the shelter in place. This is our 23rd remote hearing. It requires everyones attention and your patience. If you are not speaking, please mute your microphone and turn off your video camera. To enable public sf gov tv is streaming live. Public comment is available by calling 14156550001 entering access code 146 152 9199 when you are committed or want to submit Public Health Public Comment. When your allotted time has reached ill indicate and take the next person to speak. Best practice to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and mute the volume on our television or computer. Before i take roll, commissioners, im sad to announce the passing of o
Imperial here. And johnson, here. We expect richards to be absent. First on the agenda is items for continues. Case 202052pca for the standard environmental conditions of approval, administrative and planning code amendments. Proposed for continuance to march 18, 2020. 2018, 11430, 1776 green street are proposed for indefinite knz. Items 3a and 2018 deny 282, 780 cancer street, continued to march 5. And case number 2018149, discretionary review is withdrawn. I have no speaker cards. President koppel anyone who wishes to comment on the items proposed for continuance . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner johnson move to continue items 1 through 4 as proposed. Second. Thank you, commissioners. On the motion, diamond aye. Fung aye. Imperial aye. Moore aye. Johnson aye. Koppel aye. So moved. That motion passes unanimously. Item 2b and 3b. I will continue to the date specified, thanks. Very good. That places us under item 5, adoption of draft minutes can february, 13, 2020. P
The ceqa extension date of the existing two story with the was approximately 3190, and that the proposal that was reviewed is ready 940. I am not in is 3940. I am not entirely sure if ceqa was before or i think it was done at the same time. I am sorry. When this home was sold, and says clearly it was 1640 square feet. Wheres the discrepancy . Sometimes what areas you include in your Square Footage will be different depending on who is calculating. I am just saying, i cant speak to how they calculated what their Square Footage is area sometimes they dont count the garage, or storage space. There was a crawlspace that was not a habitable space. Prior to the proposal here, was to actually make that habitable race. I dont know if that area was included in the calculation. The only numbers i have to that effect in this case report from the ceqa review. Thank you. One more question for planning, on this, so we go to commissioner richards, bill back what was there, what is plannings disagreem
The ceqa extension date of the existing two story with the was approximately 3190, and that the proposal that was reviewed is ready 940. I am not in is 3940. I am not entirely sure if ceqa was before or i think it was done at the same time. I am sorry. When this home was sold, and says clearly it was 1640 square feet. Wheres the discrepancy . Sometimes what areas you include in your Square Footage will be different depending on who is calculating. I am just saying, i cant speak to how they calculated what their Square Footage is area sometimes they dont count the garage, or storage space. There was a crawlspace that was not a habitable space. Prior to the proposal here, was to actually make that habitable race. I dont know if that area was included in the calculation. The only numbers i have to that effect in this case report from the ceqa review. Thank you. One more question for planning, on this, so we go to commissioner richards, bill back what was there, what is plannings disagreem