are they on there as candidates? are they using fox as a platform the way sharron thinks she can use it as a candidate for 2012? is she a little ahead of schedule? looking towards 2012 to using fox, she s trying to use it openly and flagrantly. right, right. as a vehicle for election to the united states senate. right. the fox green room is now sort of the gop convention in waiting for 2012. they are all on the payroll. i think they are all they want to use it to make a lot of money, either on fox news or with books or appearances, and then they are just going to wait and see how it plays out. meantime, they have got this national audience whenever they want it. they got a paycheck, and they have got the fox news, you know, recommendation or seal of approval. it s perfect for them as they wait. do you know a little reporting required here. do you gentleman know whether fox actually has to get the pre-approval of these candidates, they are candidates, before they put the quest
that s just nonsense. it s just nonsense. senator tester, you take a crack at it. they don t want to vote flagrantly for wall street, so it s better to vote against having a vote. that s a lot safer. you don t get nailed for that one yet. we ve debated whether to debate before, chris. but the fact is we need to end too big to fail. we need to end taxpayer bailouts, we need to have some consumer protection. and the wall street reform bill will do all those things, and republicans need to come to the table and work together and come up with a bill that works for main street, instead of a system that works for wall street. were you surprised that the manure word was used so often today on c-span? i ve never heard it used before. i got to make sure you understand this, chris, because my mom is going to be calling me. we were only quoting an internal goldman sachs e-mail. that word was not being used by us. we were only quoting goldman sachs, how they were describing their own deal.
we re not talking about, we re talking about proceeding to debate is what they re blocking. that s just nonsense. it s just nonsense. senator tester, you take a crack at it. they don t want to vote flagrantly for wall street, so it s better to vote against having a vote. that s safer. we ve debated whether to debate before, chris. but the fact is we need to end too big to fail. we need to end taxpayer bailouts, we need to have some consumer protection. and the wall street reform bill will did all of those things. and republicans need to come to the table and work together and come up with a bill that works for main street instead of a system that works for wall street. were you surprised that the manure word was used so often today on c-span? i ve never used it before. i got to make sure you understand this, chris, because my mom is going to be calling me. we were only quoting an internal goldman sachs email. that word was not being used by us. we were only quoting goldman sach
we re not talking about, we re talking about proceeding to debate is what they re blocking. that s just nonsense. it s just nonsense. senator tester, you take a crack at it. they don t want to vote flagrantly for wall street, so it s better to vote against having a vote. that s a lot safer. you don t get nailed for that one yet. we ve debated whether to debate before, chris. but the fact is we need to end too big to fail. we need to end taxpayer bailouts, we need to have some consumer protection. and the wall street reform bill will did all of those things. and republicans need to come to the table and work together and come up with a bill that works for main street instead of a system that works for wall street. were you surprised that the manure word was used so often today on c-span? i ve never heard it used before. i got to make sure you understand this, chris, because my mom is going to be calling me. we were only quoting an internal goldman sachs e-mail. that word was not
johnson was really, flagrantly, unapologetically racist. he became president upon the assassination of abraham lincoln. right as the north was winning the civil war. right? and as the war the civil war was ending, this guy, johnson, became president. and johnson did everything he could to undercut the north victory in the war and to try to undercut the abolition of slavery for which the war had been fought. luckily for the country, a lot of the worst stuff that andrew johnson wanted to do, congress stepped in and stopped him and congress was able to pass a bunch of important legislation over andrew johnson s veto. he had no support. but it made johnson furious, the whole process. over and over again, congress would pass these bills to try to recognize and protect, freed former slaves in the south and johnson would get that