kavanaugh investigation i hdiot. he does not like the idea of a shot clock on the fbi. he knows agents know time has low lev little to do with memory. significance drives memory. they know that little lies point bigger lies. they know that obvious lies by the nominee about the meaning of words in a year book are a flashing signal to dig deeper. with the kavanaugh nomination in limbo and 36 days until the midterms, democrats are using the issue to the pitch to voters. former vice president joe biden rallied the faithful in providence, rhode island last night. just last week, we witnessed from the republicans on the senate judiciary committee a degree of invective blind rage and brut partisanship that threatens the senate, but the
you need to talk to me. earlier before we came on air saying, they told her to talk to a field office and the field office saying, oh, we re not actually the right people for you to talk to for that. on the one hand the president is saying they re expanding the investigation but are they going to talk to people like kerry ber tram? here s a familiar name, another expert in the new york times op-ed former director james comey said the fbi is capable of rooting out inconsistencies in kavanaugh s story. quote, this is comey, they will confront people with testimony. and other accounts testing them, testing them in a professional way. agents have better nonsense detectors than partisans because they aren t starting with a conclusion. they also know little lies point too bigger lies. obvious lies by the nominee about the meaning of words in a year book are a flashing signal to dig deeper. glenn, expand. unfortunately this is an artificial exercise because if you interview one person a
a cloud whether he can be seen by americans as a neutral umpire as he called himself in november. but if you have a process that is short-circuited an designed to produce a result, i think it only deepens that infection and the question of whether the court s legitimacy will be further eroded. i think that is a risk if this process is not seen on the level. so comey also wrote in this op-ed saying yes the alleged incident occurred 36 years ago goer but fbi agents know time has very little do with memory. every married person remembers the wedding on their wedding day. significance drives memory. and they also know that little lies point to bigger lies. they know obvious lies by the nominee about the meaning of words in a year book are a flashing signal to dig deeper. so katherine, you know, he is underscoring his great
it s hard to imagine in this day and age. who jumps out? give us names. oh, gosh, the people you have kamala harris, cory booker, kerstin gillibrand. you have people just in the way that they vote they have a big red flashing signal saying i think i want to run in 2020. there are also huge lefties. there s something else, something else that they are that i think about all the time. they re cautious. in donald trump s america, what he showed, at least at that point is you can t be cautious. you have someone like tom steier who is a billionaire who is running all these ads saying impeach the president. he s the opposite of cautious. it s easy not to be cautious when you have zillions of dollars. i think that s one of the things to look at, is people willing to take a risk. i think you re spot on.