Page 87 - Footnote News Today

Of the impeachment movement altogether. iter is dead and over. i suspect that youll see even more americans reject this really terrible distraction for the country. we also had to deal with robert muellers evolving purview. i think that really show the bias on the double standard. when people who supported trump lied, he threw the book at that. when people like christopher steele, who hated drum, lied, or when glenn simpson was engaging with russians, robert mueller was hear no evil, see no evil...

Wrong doing." that process other than the criminal justice system for accusing a president of wrong-doing, is that impeachment? >> im not going to comment on that. >> in your report you also wrote that you did not want to "potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct." for the nonlawyers in the room, what did you mean by "potentially preempt constitutional processes " ? >> im not going to try to explain that. >> thats coming from pay o page one of volume tw...

Conference you explained that "the opinion says that the constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing." that process other than the criminal justice system for accusing a president of wrongdoing, is that impeachment? >> im not going to comment on that. >> in your report you also wrote that you did not want to "potentially pre-empt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct." for the non-lawyers in...

Criminal justice system for accusing a president of wrongdoing, is that impeachment? >> im not going to comment on that. >> in your report you also wrote that you did not want to "potentially pre-empt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct." for the non-lawyers in the room, what did you mean by "potentially pre-empt constitutional processes"? >> im not going to try to explain that. >> that actually is coming from page 1 of volume 2. in the footnote is the reference to th...

>> im not going to try to explain that. >> thats coming from pay o page one of volume two in the footnote is the reference to this. what are those constitutional processes? >> i think i heard you mention at least one. >> impeachment, correct? >> im not going to comment. >> come on! after making the case for seven hourings, they said they were waiting to decide on possible impeachment. >> my position has always been whatever decision we made in that regard would have to be done with our strongest...

And ask him about the specifics of the substance to what mueller testified to yesterday and trump lashed out of that reporter and said youre fake news. he has yet to issue any statement, white house, campaign, nobody responded to the substance of what mueller says in the report, what he said yesterday during that hearing and beyond asking the question, at some point, right, where do we go next? when donald trump just brushes it aside, gas lights the whole country. hes president and has the bully...

Robert mueller sucked the life out of the impeachment movement altogether. terrible distraction for the country. i think this really showed the bias and the double standard. when people who supported trump, they threw the book at him. when people at christopher steele who hated trump, was engaging, robert mueller was hear no evil, speak no evil. i dont understand why its in robert muellers purview -- he did not write this report, okay? the fusion. its referenced in a footnote. its very clear tha...

>> should that be asked? yes, i think they should ask that. i think he will say i never reached that question because of the doj policy. but then you ask did you find substantial evidence that he obstructed justice? he said yes in the report. >> if president trump was an ordinary citizen would he have been charged with obstruction? whats the answer mueller will give? >> i think mueller will say i never reached that question because of the policy. the counter is did you find substantial evidence ...

New york times"? >> again, i have no idea. >> i counted about 75 times. how many times did you cite fox news? >> as with the other two, i have no idea. >> about 25 times. ive got to say, it looks like volume two is mostly regurgitated press stories. honestly, theres almost nothing in volume two that i couldnt already hear or know simply by having a $50 cable news subscription. however, your investigation caused the american taxpayers $25 million. you cited media reports nearly 200 times in your ...

Obstruction? thats in the report. hef has to say yes. >> did you intend for congress to act on the findings of your report? thats a key question. theres a footnote that cited the constitution impeachment clause. >> wait and see. thats one of the big questions. we dont know the answer. it will determine part of his whole attitude of the hearing. whether hes willing to embrace and answer a question such as that or hell stick straight with the language in the report. in which case theres still oppo...