Page 105 - Forensics News Today

Court. she answers to the justices. they decide whether shes got a job tomorrow, whether she gets a pay raise next year, and by their own admission there were limits here. they-limited themselves, apparently active employees of the supreme court, not, for example, clerks who might have been the ones who left the court. thats what clerks do. they turn over in a year or two or three. the other thing thats concerning is that theyve all salt so conceded they didnt treat the justices the same as the ...

Where hollywood could actually bend and start to do things differently? because somebody handed alec baldwin what they called a cold gun. and gutierrez reed who now faces involuntary manslaughter charges spun it. she made sure there were no bullets in the chamber. so either people were really bad at their jobs and/or -- maybe its an and/or, what culpability does alec baldwin hold? dont you check the gun yourself? >> thats such a great point especially when you are talking about the magnitude of ...

Bullets that were not dummy bullets, they were not props, and handed that to dave hall, who has taken the plea agreement. he was under the impression that the firearm was secure, but then as part of his role as first assistant director announced on set that it was a cold weapon. meaning that it was not live. and that is when he handed the weapon to alec baldwin. he was trying to pull off a move -- or practice a move, i should say called the cross draw. he denies pulling the trigger here. but whe...

A movie set, it doesnt matter, or make all of these statements that we knew when he was making them that prosecutor was focused on every word he was saying and the f.b.i. and forensics contradict everything he was saying. >> harris: when you talk with the prosecutor in an hour from now what will you ask her? >> i will ask her what was the evidence that led her to believe that this -- that alec baldwin should be charged. number two, given that this is the high celebrity, high profile case will sh...

Months. you said none of it was by accident. can you tell us more about that? >> well, let me explain from my years of experience and many law enforcement were working with. when they see these stories they shake their head. they are experiencing the same type of thing. when we have a 16-year-old young mother and a 10-month-old child, infant who we know from forensics these suspects stood over the top of them and fired rounds into each of their heads. this is an intentional slaughter and massacr...

>> harris: what will he face if he loses? >> he has every incentive to fight these charges. every incentive. >> harris: what happens if he loses? >> if he loses, it is up to 18 months if jail and a few thousand dollar fine. $5 thousand in fines. i think were in a society now that accepting accountability actually and going through a path of redemption will probably speak much better for mr. baldwin than fighting saying they had nothing to do and resurrecting the statements he made that i didnt p...

Apartment just earlier this morning. so far no spotting of alec baldwin. we have no reaction that weve been able to gather from him or his camp. judge, what should he do at this point? he has given some interviews and i heard you say you shouldnt talk. >> he should keep his mouth shut. thats one of the biggest problems here. as a prosecutor i look at all the twitters and interviews as a treasure trove of evidence. you dare take the stand well contradict you and contradict your testimony based on...

Why would you curtail an investigation? i want to say something. what ive read about this investigation is that within its parameters, and they were significant parameters i just described, it was a heck of an investigation, they tried to look at printers and forensics and i.t. and they conducted a hundred interviews. not a sham, but rather an extremely curtailed investigation that really wouldnt get to the truth. but why would you curtail and put those handcuffs on somebody investigating what h...

0 what would a reasonable person do? and they did something that fell below that standard, right? and that conduct then caused the death of somebody else. look, i think this was really a no-brainer. i think that there was negligence on the part of all three of them. failing to make sure. >> dana: thank you for joining us. judge jeanine will have an interview with the prosecutor. >> bill: harris will take over and the news from new mexico will than forthcoming. >> harris: alec baldwin accused of ...

Lets bring in joey jackson. illegal transport of a body, how does that happen without a body? >> it must mean they have information. we could learn if they know anything with respect to the body or any trace of the body. thats yet to be determined. that would lead me to that conclusion. what im interested in knowing is what else they have. were going to be looking for forensics. what do they have with respect to that? what do they have in terms of cell phone data? a lot of circumstantial evidenc...