with classified markings were found at biden s home thursday evening. surely this news was damming to those democrats who have spent the past seven years squawking about the rule of law and norms, right? wrong. what is the proper thing for a former president to do if he finds that there are government documents or classified documents that are in his possession? my understanding is they did the right thing. maybe there is a different procedure for dealing with them that we re unaware of. that s a meaningful thing that we could look at. but obviously, we don t want to turn this into just a political football. i know exactly what president biden said when he was informed that these documents were found in his office, in his office in washington. that was a, oh, followed by a four-letter expletive. it s an embarrassment no doubt. is there more to it? i doubt it. the congressman is right. it was such an embarrassment to bide than he rushed to defend himself earlier today u
open and ended shut case. watch this. this isn t a particularly complex investigation. what it looks like now, an offers space, two residences to go out there, figure out if all the classified information has been recovered, who the people were who had access to it, all the circumstances by which it came to be placed there, shouldn t take a lot of time. jonathan peter is back and he doesn t think it s that complex of an investigation but probably not for the reasons he thinks. what s your take? i find it quite remarkable that everyone came out and said, look there is no evidence of anything other than inadvertence here. there is no evidence at all. the white house has refused to answer any questions. the evidence we have seems to go against inadvertent, when you really don t know, but what s really astonishing is how all of these people are coming forth saying, look, the record as it stands shows inadvertence. what record? you have at most, you have a