Page 4 - Forth Today News Today

Receptionist know that someone on the presidents short list had attacked me. i also sent a message to the encrypted "washington post" confidential tip line. i did not use my name, but i provided the names of brett kavanaugh and mark judge. i stated that mr. kavanaugh had assaulted me in the 1980s in maryland. >> if you were watching this in realtime today, that may have just kind of seemed like laying this out, what the order here was, right? super important. this clarification of the timeline, ...

Assaulted me in the 1980s in maryland. >> if you were watching this in real time today, that may have just seemed like laying this out, what the order here was, right? super important. this clarification of the time line -- it was actually borne out by evidence that was put forth today in the hearing, including by this prosecutor who the republicans hired. this isnt just a detail here. this isnt just like getting the facts down so we can talk about this. this is actually totally critical because...

Effect through october, at least. partially. partial stay will remain in effect through october but this case will be argued at the beginning of the term. again, the three justices who want to stay invalidated completely, thomas, aledo and gorsuch, indicating as we saw throughout the day that justice gorsuch is aligning himself with justice thomas, the most conservative, giving a clear signal of where he is going to be on the future on all these cases. >> opinions come forth today is significa...

They are ready to put pen to paper and help republicans. >> a lot of changes need to be made, i have got eight to ten democrats who would be happy to sit down and start tonight working on this. >> peter: he was clear, he does not know of eight to ten democrats ready to vote, but he does know eight to ten democrats who say that they would want to help make a better what was put forth today. melissa. >> melissa: all right, got a lot of cooks in the oven. thank you for that. house speaker paul ryan...

By the nine justices of the u.s. supreme court. whats your reaction to that? >> every court decision is holding that the president exceeded his authority, that this was a veiled effort to impose a travel ban based upon religion, based upon being muslim, that it was not in keeping with the values of america or the powers the president has and he hasnt made a case that america will be safer as a result of the travel ban, so i think in all those cases the president has lost in the courts. i dont se...

Foreign government that uses trump towers or uses the trump organization properties is doing that in order to curry favor with the president. we also know that trump enterprises has business interests in sawed should a. they have business interests in many foreign countries. what the attorneys are saying is not only violates the constitution, it presents a competition issue with american companies. if you own a hotel in washington, d.c. and youre in competition with trump towers, youre at an unf...

In the past they looked at the constitutional analysis and they looked at trumps campaign statements and said i think that there is fueled by some sort of discriminatory intent. this time for the first time the court is looking at the statutory analysis, the statute that the president so often invokes for his power here and saying even under that the president hasnt justified the national security interest justifying this travel ban. we havent heard anything from the justice department, but the ...

Department has said fair market transactions like the one the attorney general is describing, cant possibly violate the constitution and sean spicer today also addressed this lawsuit calling it pure partisan gamesmanship. take a listen to who he said. >> the president interests as previously discussed do not violate the emoluments clause. its not hard to conclude that partisan politics is the partisan politics is what drives the suit filed by two democratic attorneys general. >> reporter: at the...

Clause of the constitution, what do you think? >> im extremely skeptical that this will lead to anything serious in terms of an impact on president trump. you know, the eel momoluments c has never been applied in the modern world and i think this is a political attempt to interfere and damage the presidency. i dont think its going to lead to anything significant, and -- and, remember. even the discovery process which, is you know, where they might get the tax returns, thats only going to take pl...

Martha: absolutely. bill: no one really knows. martha: treasure trove of 103 documents? i dont know. bill: some dvds were taken outside of his hideout a mile from pakistans west point. but these are the 100 they decided to put forth today. more to come on this, right? police calling for a truce between rival biker gangs after a deadly shootout in texas. law enforcement though not holding its breath for peace. >> i will tell you that in the gang world and in the biker world, that violence usual...