found, his attacks on freedom of speech and freedom himself. now he s betting if he has the right lies and buzzwords about wokism it will drown out his first amendment loss in court. we were the first big state to legislate against big tech sensorship because they want to silence us. you have to have protection for the first amendment rights of people. a free society requires the ability to have robust discussions about issue of public importance. this is not how a free society should operate. it s a lot of freedom talk by someone who was just smacked down by a court for violating that literally first freedom in our founding document, the first amendment. i m joined by the julian epstein, ceo of the law media group. what do you see here in his loss and him being a harvard law
mark: welcome back, i want to thank my guests for their courage. what you speak the truth, sometimes it can be a dangerous thing. all men are created equal. they are endowed by create or with certain unable able rights, among these, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, when judge jackson was asked if she agreed with those rules, natural law, she said she does not take a position, that is the problem. when you abandon our founding document, who we are as human being, red blooded, you become a
mark: welcome back, i want to thank my guests for their courage. what you speak the truth, sometimes it can be a dangerous thing. all men are created equal. they are endowed by create or with certain unable able rights, among these, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, when judge jackson was asked if she agreed with those rules, natural law, she said she does not take a position, that is the problem. when you abandon our founding document, who we are as human being, red blooded, you become a
national settlement, roe and casey have inflamed debate and deepened division. it is time to heed the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the peoples elected representatives. you are in expert unconstitutional. what do you make of this claim that roe v. wade is not heeding the founding document? i think it is intellectual and historically bankrupt. the founding document did not list all of the rights we have. he doesn t say anything about our right to marry, our rights to decide how to bring up our children, our freedom to think what we will. it protects liberty in very broad terms. it protects equality. this idea by justice alito he is backed by the right wing of the court and by many right-wing activists, this idea that the constitution protects only those rights that are listed and those rights that are rooted in a massage earnest
unreasonable because this is about really defining the core values of the party. the party believes in freedom. what are we doing here to women that seek out abortion services. which party? well, you know, the reality here is at six weeks. many women don t know they re pregnant. a personal point of privilege, i m 39 weeks pregnant. congratulations. any moment now, girl. it could happen on national tv. let s bring it. water s going to brab. come on, baby. i m ready for her to get here. but i have to tell you, this is my third pregnancy. at no point at the six week mark did i know i was expecting. and i just as an elder millennial, i must add none of us thought that body autonomy was going to be on the line ever. the fact that we have freedom to do what we need to do with our bodies, american women, we thought was enshrined in our founding document. so if you re listening out there