home, we ll search your person, and your business and whatever the hell we want to there is nothing we can do about it, so concerned with framers of the constitution, the rest of the the country with bill of rights, this the 4th amendment to the constitution of the united states, it was violated. by the department of justice. it was violated by this master. you can t say you can take all of the other boxes that happen to be in the same place, what kind of warrant is that, unconstitutional. unconstitutional this search warrant, under the 4 amendment of the united states, they will do anything, go anywhere, search anything and clobber anyone to prevent him from running for president, that number one. number two they do not want the republicans to take back the house or senate in upcoming election, because they know they will be
home, we ll search your person, and your business and whatever the hell we want to there is nothing we can do about it, so concerned with framers of the constitution, the rest of the the country with bill of rights, this the 4th amendment to the constitution of the united states, it was violated. by the department of justice. it was violated by this master. you can t say you can take all of the other boxes that happen to be in the same place, what kind of warrant is that, unconstitutional. unconstitutional this search warrant, under the 4 amendment of the united states, they will do anything, go anywhere, search anything and clobber anyone to prevent him from running for president, that number one. number two they do not want the republicans to take back the house or senate in upcoming election, because
this is, they try to humiliate sincer to holly, not about january 6, the main went about january 6, nancy pelosi, has been immunized by the committee, members of whom she appointed and had to approve. you can look yourself, article 1 provides no such authority, none to the congress of the united states, everything they are doing, which is openly and affirmatively criminal in nature is a violation of separation of powers that goes back. you can see in federalist papers, framers of the constitution mention it. when you get the phony republicans like cheney waving the constitution, they are not waving our constitution, perhaps the 1934 soviet constitution, but it is not ours. let s get into the hearings again. what is going on?
that s true, your honor, but the point there was the see the thinking of the framers of the constitution. i m just wondering if there isn t a base, inconsistency there. that s just a little bit of what it sounded like when they were actually adjudicating and hearing this case originally. republican presidents appointed much of the roe majority, that was them discussing the arguments in 72, and it was a back then a 7-2 decision. men at the time, five appointed by republicans. and greenhouse stresses this in her new york times piece responding to friday s ruling, noting that alito is saying all of those justice were so
and so here you have an amendment that says nothing about objecting or rejecting, and yet we did have some recent practice of the happening within the terms of the electoral count act. so we started with that text. we were called in that discussion with the vice president, who said, i cannot wait to go to heaven and meet the founding fathers and tell them, they work that you did in putting together our constitution is a work of genius. thank you. it was divinely inspired. there is one sentence that i would like to talk to you a little bit about. so then we went to structure. and again, the vice president s first instinct here is so decisive on this question. there is just no way that the framers of the constitution, who divided power and authority, who separated out, who had broken away from george the