santorum bold. it s a little weird. the fight being a capitalized thing makes it seem like it s some sort of a, a proper noun fight. okay. while we re talking campaign signs, can you see me? there we go. while we re talking campaign signs, here [ honking ] there s a horn. i don t think that was for me. here s a very rare sight. it s a fred karger sign. the fred karger for president sign, the only sign in which a candidate has put his own face. go, fred. so jon huntsman, i question the color. rick santorum, i questioned the inexplicable italics and capitalization. fred karger has a sign. awesome. there s a clear winner up here in the war among the signs. there s a candidate who has by far inarguably the best signs in state of hn new hampshire. the sign and the candidate, next.
here s a very rare sight. it s a fred karger sign. the fred karger for president sign, the only sign in which a candidate has put his own face. go, fred. so jon huntsman, i question the color. rick santorum, i questioned the inexplicable italics and capitalization. fred karger has a sign. awesome. there s a clear winner up here in the war among the signs. there s a candidate who has by far inarguably the best signs in state of new hampshire. the sign and the candidate, next. why do we have aflac. aflac. and major medical?
the fight being a capitalized thing makes it seem like it s some sort of a, a proper noun fight. okay. while we re talking campaign signs, can you see me? there we go. while we re talking campaign signs, here [ honking ] there s a horn. i don t think that was for me. here s a very rare sight. it s a fred karger sign. the fred karger for president sign, the only sign in which a candidate has put his own face. go, fred. so jon huntsman, i question the color. rick santorum, i questioned the inexplicable italics and capitalization. fred karger has a sign. awesome. there s a clear winner up here in the war among the signs. there s a candidate who has by far inarguably the best signs in state of hn new hampshire. the sign and the candidate, next.
fox news is barring this man from its republican presidential debate this week simply because he is gay. fred karger meets all of fox s requirements for being in the debate, which are the candidate be registered with the federal elections commission as a presidential exploratory committee or presidential campaign. the candidate meets all u.s. constitutional requirements and has garnered at least an average of 1% in five national polls based on most recent polling leading up to the registration day. karger s campaign sites five polls, harris interactive poll, which saw the candidate tied with tim pawlenty at 2%, karger has also placed at 1% in three polls, one of them a fox news poll, and just under 1% in a
fifth. and to reiterate, fox s own rules call for an average of 1% in five national polls, and the 2% showing in the most recent harris poll gets him there, but fox news knows that fred karger is openly gay and fox news is not about to let an openly gay presidential candidate in a republican debate. but fox news will allow this man in the debate, former fox news contributor rick santorum, who polls 50% lower than fred karger in the harris interactive poll. santorum, of course, is not openly gay, but he is deeply confused about human sexuality and has left many of us concerned for his mental health when he finds himself