Page 6 - Fred Tecce News Today

Said that he relied on speculation from the case and the that the case was ruled homicide without any medical evidence. fred, lets ask you about that. the report again, obtained by "the new york times," the prosecutors have not publicly released it but "the times" says, it says that the cause of death was drowning due to plug being removed by some other person. does that wash? >> right. well, actually it does wash, jon. what the defense lawyer is upset about this examiner will get on witness sta...

Bathtub. defense lawyer can examine her where the information came problem. that is why the good lord established cross-examination. she can establish reasonable doubt but i dont think it is proper for her to do this. jon: sound like fred likes the line in coroners report. what do you think about it. >> i would of lo the to have the coroner on the stand to cross-examine this is absolutely ridiculous. that this coroner can go so far that the plug pulled out and that is not accidental. that it was...

Information comes to her and listens to it. she uses the information she hears on the other line of the judge says, hey, they should have better care to make sure nobody was butt dialed. jon: so you think, youre good with this court decision? >> i think -- >> come on. >> i think that because, because the woman who received the call didnt do anything to infringe on someone elses privacy, she did very passive act, jon. she answered her phone and listened. something we do thousands of times a day. ...

Place those accidental calls should not have expectation of privacy. it all stems from a case in 2013 in which a man tried to sue a coworker who listened in on his conversation after he accidentally pocket dialed her. the woman also record ad portion of the conversation on the iphone. the judge upholding a district courts decision saying that people should know that the dangers of pocket dialing and take steps to prevent it. so what about this ruling? former federal prosecutor fred tecce joins u...

Admissible evidence. jon: fred, last word. >> i disagree with the way the court went out. should look what the deft did and looked what the plaintiff did and i think that was the wrong analysis. jon: well see if it goes to a higher court. could happen. >> have a great weekend, guys. jon: arthur, fred have a great weekend. jenna: have you ever done that by accident? jon: i have occasionally pocket dialed people. jenna: i like pocket dial rather than the other anatomy part. basically what happens ...

Like someone cowering. that is part of the issue. >> right. jenna: but what her story as she tells it. fill as narrative you see play out in the a movie. this guy was obviously a bad guy. he was 10 years older than her. getting to prosecutors. how do they go through the list of charges? there are 11 charges against her including first agree felony aggravated murder. these are a lot of charges. will they be able to prove them all? >> they only need to prove one of them, prankly the aggravated fel...

Top of the hour. eric: you didnt tell me who he is so ill have to wait for ten minutes. >> well surprise you. ♪ ♪ uma: all right. were awaiting a verdict in the murder trial of former new england patriots player aaron hernandez on day four of deliberations as jurors decide whether to convict hernandez of the murder of semipro player odin lloyd back in 2013. lets bring in fred tecce. gentlemen, nice of you here. >> thanks for having me. uma: obviously the jury is still out but, eric, you say ...

Robert durst. jon: theres also within the question of timing, fred, the fact that he was arrested on the same weekend basically, that hbo show had him spouting out about i killed them all, supposedly thats what he said. >> go figure. jon: now, his attorney says look these fbi agents didnt even know a california arrest warrant had been issued at the time they picked him up. >> well, they didnt, and thats not the point. ultimately if california indicts him, that issue goes away, and thats an issue...

Chance. would i like to see it though. well check it out. >> two wisconsin teenagers will stand trial as adults for the brutal stabbing of a classmate a judge upholding a doctors findings that the girls are competent to stand trial despite challenges from their defense attorneys. the girls who were 12 years old at time of this attack, theyre accused of attempted murder in the savage stabbing of another girl, a friend of theirs, who was also only 12 years old. thankfully the victim survived. pros...

Is called a reverse waiver hearing where the defense argues that they should be returned to juvenile court because they can be best treated in the juvenile system. and because that will properly reflect the severity of the crime. and arguing that here will be tricky because the crime is so severe. but that will be the next step and it will be a big deal here. eric: fred, finally a slam-dunk if they admit it? >> yeah. i think proving their gilt or innocence, proving their guilt will not be diffic...