fetterman pounced responding via twitter in pennsylvania it s called a veggie tray. a minor story on a slow august day, you wonder? hardly. $500,000 from the flap. enough to buy him plenty more television ads showcasing his gym shorts and at thes and hoodies. the projects of a persona that republicans equate to that of a professional wrestler. coverage of crude tate gate to dwell on whether oz is really living in pennsylvania. fetterman as included snooki of jersey shore fame and little steven from the e street band tying dr. oz to the garden state of new jersey. this week, the social media mud slinging escalated after a daily beast report that oz owns ten houses, not the two he had previously claimed. fetterman tweeted this, i have never spoke on the a p.a. resident who doesn t know how many house that is a have, let alone be off by eight. now, oz struck back saying he bought them with his own money. a diss of fetterman long relied on financial assistance from his family. yo
why do we rubber neck? why is it that we can t look away from a crash whether it s literal or metaphorical, even more so when celebrities are involved? the question keeps arising in recent weeks and months whether the fiery tragic car crash death of actress anne heche or now the court battle of kobe bryant s widow of the helicopter crash that killed her husband and daughter gianna in january of 2020. friday vanessa bryant was the final plaintiff s witness in the federal lawsuit that she and christopher chester, whose wife and daughter were also among the nine killed in the crash, filed against los angeles county. they re seeking damages alleging that cell phone photos of human remains that first responders took and disseminated, photos which bryant and chester have never seen were taken as souvenirs. the claim is for negligence and invasion of privacy. included in testimony were accusations of one deputy using
the photos of the victims to, quote, try to impress a woman at a bar. bragging about how he had been at the crash site. and the photos being shared with firefighters at a gala event at the universal city hilton hotel. the county contends legitimate reasons for first responders to take and receive the photos, including to help determine the size of the crash site and decide what resources were needed. it claims that all images were deleted upon orders of superior officers. they no longer exist in any form and were never intended to enter the public domain or appear on the internet. but as the la times reports, an expert witness who testified last week for bryant and chester said the behavior of the deputies and jordan were examples of macabre long standing practice in law enforcement of taking and sharing gruesome photos especially when celebrities are involved. pretty horrible stuff, right? but why do people want to see such images? joining me now is kolton skriber in, ph.d. from the