Page 15 - Front Third News Today

To impose. The question is thats one thing we can do. Im trying to get to whether we can make a motion today so we know what we are getting. Is it possible to say on a condition of approval that this project would adhere to our signage guidelines separate and part from the formula retail legislation rather than saying its up to it needs to comply with the signage requirements. So i think perhaps the condition that the project sponsor would further work with on the department on the location of t...

The signage requirements. So i think perhaps the condition that the project sponsor would further work with on the department on the location of the signage. Its my understanding of this use that there are distinctions between each of the locations even though its formula retail, thats part of the nuance of it that they do make distinctions between the different locations. Okay, working with staff, we already have our guidelines as lights and things. Okay. Excellent. Commissioners, condition no....

Constructed yet . Kate stacy City Attorneys Office it would depend whether the project has all its permits and achieved rights and whether or not the code would apply at that time. We would have to look at the status of the project. Okay. And what we are attempting to impose. The question is thats one thing we can do. Im trying to get to whether we can make a motion today so we know what we are getting. Is it possible to say on a condition of approval that this project would adhere to our signag...

Would apply at that time. We would have to look at the status of the project. Okay. And what we are attempting to impose. The question is thats one thing we can do. Im trying to get to whether we can make a motion today so we know what we are getting. Is it possible to say on a condition of approval that this project would adhere to our signage guidelines separate and part from the formula retail legislation rather than saying its up to it needs to comply with the signage requirements. So i thin...

Issuance on august 22, 2014 to 834 44th avenue building with two off Street Parking spaces. Public hearing was held on november 19, 2014 and the matter is on for further consideration today. It was continued to allow time for dbi to conduct a site inspection and for the permit holder to submit revised plans. No additional briefing was allowed. Perhaps we will start with mr. Duffy then from dbi. I have a financial situation with the law firm on a separate matter but im prepared to hear this case ...

Issuance on august 22, 2014 to 834 44th avenue building with two off Street Parking spaces. Public hearing was held on november 19, 2014 and the matter is on for further consideration today. It was continued to allow time for dbi to conduct a site inspection and for the permit holder to submit revised plans. No additional briefing was allowed. Perhaps we will start with mr. Duffy then from dbi. I have a financial situation with the law firm on a separate matter but im prepared to hear this case ...

Them to address that. We are going to systematically go through every street in park merced. Weve let them knoll that. Know that. We expect them to replant all trees and thats where were currently embarked upon. That was along the same lines are you finished . Yes. Park merced has been before this board several times in recent years and if theyve knocked all these trees down and not replaced them. Right now you find them it is penldzing. Pending. They have written an appeal. Some of the trees we...

Minutes for rebuttal. Nieftsdz neither of you have to use all 15 minutes and 6 minutes for rebuttal. President cindy wu thank you. Good afternoon, tina chang, Planning Department staff. The item before you are a request for discretionary review for three Building Permits applications. Two Building Permits for two lots. One permit is for the vertical and horizontal expansion of the existing Single Family dwelling unit and 22 ord court and the secretary second is the Single Family home. The third ...

Issuance on august 22 2014 to 834 44th avenue building with two off Street Parking spaces. Public hearing was held on november 19, 2014 and the matter is on for further consideration today. It was continued to allow time for dbi to conduct a site inspection and for the permit holder to submit revised plans. No additional briefing was allowed. Perhaps we will start with mr. Duffy then from dbi. I have a financial situation with the law firm on a separate matter but im prepared to hear this case w...

Juan circle which was the first time this ever came to the departments attention that park merced didnt realize they needed permits in order to remove a significant tree so they havent been on our radar since 2007. No one ever called in a complaint so weve been looking at a lot of sites and earlier this year we issued a fine to park merced for the removal of a number of trees on gonzalez drive and its currently pending. Were currently scheduling an administrative hearing for them to address that...