which might be years after the incident. the complicated process and huge time involved is why the us state department s office of global criminaljustice says content must be preserved for years. tech companies have a role to play here in recognising that while these wheels ofjustice do turn slowly, they do turn indelibly, so this information could be critically important. we have already had situations in which the information that was on social media platforms such as facebook otherwise has been used as evidence in a court of law, and so we need to be able to preserve this so that the potential evidentiary value can later be mined when we have a better understanding about what happened and who might be responsible. human rights organisation say the answer is to warn users the video is graphic, also to remove it or archive it. this would protect people while allowing the videos to be preserved for possible future use as evidence. we are asking the social
responsible. human rights i organisation say the answers are the options to remove it or archive at. this would protect people while allowing the videos to be preserved for possible future use as evidence. possible future use as evidence. ~ ., ., evidence. we are asking the social media evidence. we are asking the social media companies - evidence. we are asking the social media companies to l evidence. we are asking the - social media companies to allow for a system that international investigators could use to get access to content that has been taken down to investigate potential war crimes. activists sa the potential war crimes. activists say the mays potential war crimes. activists say the mays hill potential war crimes. activists say the mays hill - potential war crimes. activists say the mays hill - major- say the mays hill major social media platforms are open to the idea but have yet to act. ~ . , to the idea but have yet to act. . ., , ., act. we have been engaging
losing even one video is concerning for open source investigators. proving that war crimes have been committed is incredibly hard, so they need to view as many angles as possible. it s almost like piecing. together a jigsaw puzzle. some angles like this one can help us understand i the direction of travel - of the missile for example. in some of the other videos,| we have blurred the footage, but for my colleagues it s - important to understand how a person was wounded - and what caused their death. human rights experts believe the answer is to warn people that a video is graphic and keep it online. or to remove it but create an independent archive for deleted footage from warzones. this would protect users while allowing the videos to be preserved for possible future use. tech companies have a role to play in recognising that while the wheels ofjustice do turn slowly, they do turn, and eventually this information could be critically important. we have already had situations in which t
future use as evidence. tech company several to play future use as evidence. tech company several to play here future use as evidence. tech company several to play here in future use as evidence. tech company several to play here in recognising - several to play here in recognising that while several to play here in recognising that while wheels ofjustice due to slowly. that while wheels ofjustice due to slowly, they do turn indelibly. eventually this information could be criticat eventually this information could be criticat we eventually this information could be critical. we have already had situations in which the information that was situations in which the information that was on situations in which the information that was on social media platforms such as that was on social media platforms such as facebook or otherwise has been such as facebook or otherwise has been used such as facebook or otherwise has been used as evidence in a court of law. been used a
removed from platforms. losing even one video is concerning for open source investigators. proving that war crimes have been committed is incredibly hard, so they need to view as many angles as possible. it s almost like piecing. together a jigsaw puzzle. some angles like this one can help us understand i the direction of travel - of the missile for example. in some of the other videos,| we have blurred the footage, but for my colleagues it s important to understand how a person was - wounded and what caused their death. human rights experts believe the answer is to warn people that a video is graphic and keep it online. or to remove it but create an independent archive for deleted footage from warzones. this would protect users while allowing the videos to be preserved for possible future use. tech companies have a role to play in recognising that while the wheels ofjustice do turn slowly, they do turn, and eventually this information could be critically important.