this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight, the flimflam game, that is the focus of tonight s angle. all right the talking point for globalist is conservative skeptical about the mcconnell s last chuck schumer don t want to solve the crisis but bowing down to donald trump who opposes it. it is not surprising, i guess, but i mean it is deeply cynical. people are dying and a lot of people s lives are hanging in the balance. i think it is a fundamental problem with trump. it is about to burn it down caucus pier they don t want to legislate because legislation is solving problems, right? they don t want the government to work. laura: similar flimsy thinking coming from conservative stalwart mitt romney and other trump loathing pro-amnesty republicans like thom tillis. it is immoral for me to think you want to go the other way because you think this is the linchpin for trump to win. i don t want to be a part of this history that fails democracy. laura: sena
[cheering]. greg: happy tuesday, everybody. i love it. all right. here s something that said piss the poop out of you. not only were a dozen members of the u.n. s palestinian relief agency involved in the hamas terrorists attacks. 10% of the staffers in gaza have direct ties to islamic terror groups. i am with hamas t-shirts were a dead giveaway. more than 100 people on the u.n. payroll. two were tracked to the hamas massacres. others supplied weapons and seven are school teachers. what is on their summer reading list? these [bleep] work in schools teaching kids. the funding is going to terrorists training schools. what i call an explosive device they call arts and crafts. an senior israel official said it s not just a few bad apples involved in the october 7 massacre. the white house says the opposite. do you have any reason to believe that that might have been more widespread, it was beyond those 14 people? i have not seen any information that affirmatively makes th
required her to maim wedding cakes for the same sex couple. a colorado bake eric that won a similar court before the court in 2018. the left immediately reacted by making predictable claims about attacks on gay rights. that s not what it s about. even smith, the web designer, says this is not about choosing who to work with. it s about choosing the message that i m being asked to promote . karine jean-pierre claimed the ruling takes us backwards. first, we re deeply disappointed in the supreme court s decision today in 303 creative, which takes our nation back ward in the fight for equality. this decision undermines the basic truth that no american should face discrimination for who they are or who they love. it s even more disappointing as we close out pride month. lawrence: the vice president agreed with the press secretary and claimed the decision threatened future progress . kamala also said the court paves the way for businesses to discriminate in the name of free e
and i think that across the board, the vast majority of the american people don t agree with a lot of the decisions the courts are making. president biden in an exclusive interview with my colleague, nicolle wallace, responding to today s very predictable supreme court decision on affirmative action. and that is where we begin tonight, with the united states supreme court once again turning the arc of justice away from equality and back to the early 20th century. striking down the use of affirmative action in college admissions. the roberts court, which wouldn t even look like the court it is today without affirmative action, decided that race conscious admissions programs at harvard university and the university of north carolina violate equal protection under the constitution. it is fitting then that it would be the court s first black woman justice, ketanji brown jackson, who clearly articulated the cost of this latest regression. writing in her dissent, with let them
want to mess. all of that and more is coming up. in the good sunday morning to. you i am katie phang. as the saying goes, those who don t know history are destined to repeat. it s now this juncture after this conservative super majority on the supreme court got affirmative action in higher education instruct down where is it biden s plan to forgive more than 400 billion dollars in student debt, i think it is time that we talk about how those two things have been leaked for decades. higher education in america did not always come with such a hefty price tag. in fact through the 1950s it was largely free and treated as a public goods. why? because graduates used their education towards the betterment of society. that all changed in the 1960s when anti-war and civil rights students activism hit college campuses and universities. and those colleges and universities responded by developing of hidden action policies to diversify their overall on the right student body. southern cal