Yes, you too. All right, you guys, make way. So, elie honig, she is now bringing that document, which the judge has now looked at, to the clerk. Correct, anderson. And what we just saw was the judge reviewing that indictment. And to be clear, that is not a substantive review. That indictment appeared to be quite long. The judge does not read through it and have to sign off on it. Thats The Grand Jurys province. Thats already happened. The judge is just making sure that there is no procedural irregularities. Thats why you heard that quick questioning, did Everything Go as expected in the jury room. The individual said no problems. Its being sent to the Clerks Office where the next step is it will be docketed. It will become part of the official record. It will be available to all of us in the public and the media, assuming that its not under seal. All indications are that its not going to be under seal. If thats the case, we will have access to that document momentarily. And michael moo
and fingerprinted a federal court appearance captured by a sketch artist. you re seeing one such example. these moments you re looking at here are that which donald trump has blatantly tried to overshadow with this is own series of events and speeches and recent pr programming. well, we can all see how this case is different right now. the early reporting is focused on how it will follow a traditional trajectory. the new york times puts it that way. next up we have a date for trump codefendant walt nauta to enter his plea, june 27th. and then traditionally, the status conference hearings that you would see over a course of couple months, the government supplying evidence to the defense. and that material can then inform the defense lawyers strategies. trump s lawyers may try a kind of more serious investigation of this odd defense that trump has been publicly mounted that the de the classified documents he says were secretly or magically declassified before he left offic
somebody who wants to be in the courtroom is, but then when you see the fact that this now opens up each of the people within that courtroom to the exposure of the wrath of somebody who is not afraid to use the court of public opinion and bend it at his will in a way that undermines the safety at times of people, you already heard josh could check-in in the washington d.c. case, january 6th saying, listen, the more you play in this quarter public opinion, the likelihood increases that i may move that child it up. now i wonder if the stretch will have a similar notion here, where the very reasons you articulated, abby, we just saw, although she was a clerk it seems, we saw a black woman walk across that screen. next to a black man. the oval ready heard fani willis be called racist by donald trump. you have heard accusations that she has been somehow intimate experience relationship with the gang bang or for some reason, because it helps his narrative. so her security has had to incr
details are of these indictment. what we do know from the paperwork, that the grand jury returned ten indictments, guys. and do you have a sense of when we will get more details? will those come from fani willis, if she chooses to speak tonight, as may perhaps seem likely? or will more become clear as that document is seen online? reporter: well, i think two things need to happen. i mean, first of all, these indictments need to be processed. they need to be stamped by the clerk. potentially in order for fani willis to speak freely about what the grand jury has actually returned today. and oit s a little unclear how long that will take. we re past 9:00 p.m. we re well past when most of the clerk s office staff would be here to assist them in processing that. we don t know how long it s going to take for these full indictments to be made public. and it s possible that we could hear remarks from fani willis on this case. she spent two and a half years
but his legal team has obviously just been watching this as closely as anyone else has, as we are, to see when this actually happens, when they are notified of it. i will say one thing that i do believe is going to be different here, beyond the fact that we were able to watch that moment there which in and of itself we have not seen with the indictments. we do believe there s an expectation we would likely hear from the district attorney here. that s the same district attorney that trump has been attacking and what i have heard from seeing these other indictments happen, where trump has been the first person to come out and present his side of it. it seems like that time span is t getting shorter and shorter with each indictment. and instead we are hearing from the prosecutors earlier on. we certainly did with jack smith in the last indictment. there is certainly potential we would hear something from fani willis here. someone who, i should note, in recent days had to email her staff