Page 29 - Given Office News Today

Rumors from reporters that the grand jury considering charges against mr. mccabe had declined to vote an indictment. we believe that if the grand jury has in fact voted a here they use a legal term well explain in a minute, not a true bill, the justice manual compels you not to resubmit the case to the same or a different grand jury. as "the wall street journal" headline puts it tonight, its a sign that the case may be in jeopardy. former u.s. attorney harry litman, a frequent guest of ours offe...

Believe an indictment was coming. but that didnt happen. in a letter to the doj, mccabes own attorneys write, quote, we heard rumors from reporters starting this morning that the grand jury considering charges against mr. mccabe had declined to vote an indictment. we believe that if the grand jury has, in fact, voted -- and here they use a legal term well explain in a minute -- not a true bill, the justice manual compels you not to resubmit the case to the same or a different grand jury. as "the...

Was reconvened, leading most to believe an indictment was coming. but that didnt happen. in a letter to the doj, mccabes own attorneys wrote we heard rumors from reporters that the grand jury considering charges against mr. mccabe had declined to vote an die. we believe that if the grand jury has in fact voted a here they use a legal term well explain in a minute, not a true bill, the justice manual compels you not to resubmit the case to the same or a different grand jury. as the "wall street j...

Return an indictment is something that happens maybe once every five years in a given office. if it occurred here given the magnitude of visibility of the mccabe case its a stunning rebuke for overreaching and playing politics. more on this, mike schmidt from the "new york times" is here and matt miller a former spokesman for the department of justice. mike, start by telling us where this story is 24 hours later. this letter that i read from was sent by mccabes lawyer to the justice -- or to the...

Once every five years in a given office. if it occurred here, given the magnitude and visibility of the mccabe case, its a stunning and humiliating rebuke for overreaching and playing politics. more on this story mike schmidt from "the new york times" is here, joyce vance, and matt miller, former spokesman for the department of justice. mike, start by telling us where this story is 24 hours later, this letter that i read from was sent by mccabes lawyers to the u.s. attorneys office today trying ...

Those leaders. no matter which party holds sway or which person holds a given office, i think its vitsal for us to remember, that if we lose our trust and confidence, for any reason, its time to go. the job we were called upon to do for the nation is too important. the lives we are sworn to protect, too precious to permit any doubt or uncertainty in that regard. general mcchrystal did the right thing by offering to resign. i think it is also critically important for us to remember the mission ye...

>> we do not have that luxury those of us in the uniform, we do not have the right nor should we assume the prerogative to cast doubt upon the ability or mock the motives of our civilian leader, elected or appointed. we are and must remain a neutral instrument of the state, accountable to and respectful of those leaders. no matter which party holds sway or which person holds a given office. >> james, you wore the uniform. this is, goes back to george washington, the whole founding of the republi...

I was proud one year ago to support him for the afghanistan command, and i think its worth noting his strong leadership and the foundation he has laid for future success there. but i cannot excuse his lack of judgment with respect to the "rolling stone" article or a command climate he evidently permitted that was at best disrespectful of civilian authority. we do not have that luxury, those of us in uniform. we do not have the right, nor should we ever assume the prerogative, to cast doubt upon ...