Logistics, at least, thats nine months, so count 9 months from this summit, and that would be the date of a possible summit, but according to the expectations that were then, then, thats why the result is already diplomatic for us it will be positive if we maintain attention to russian aggression, you see is happening, russia has already removed the issue, they are hitting objects. To our civilians, all this is no longer discussed, as if, well, well , they hit and hit, yes, this is a disaster, as soon as this is translated in everyones mind into an ordinary conflict between two countries, which, well, hit those, hit those , listen, but where, but where is the fact that russia has been violating International Law so profoundly for a year now, the chinese turn a blind eye to it, well, they are telling their theory there, which is false. Is not worth it, the image of china is well understood by everyone, but in those countries who want chinese influence, it will grow there, in countries t
Crimea, can we talk about that, and could this indicate that repression against the citizens of ukraine, against the Crimean Tatars on the territory of the temporarily occupied peninsula will increase . It is very difficult for me to understand the logic of the fsb, but i can make an assumption that the repression will increase in the future. The pressure will increase, and any manifestation of the position regarding the support of ukraine, or regarding the definition of the ukrainian civic identity will, well , be intensified, will be intensified by repressions on the part of the occupiers, so we also connect this with. The fact that on may 18, we remember the date of the deportation of the Crimean Tatars and the fsb officers visit the crimean activists and warn that under no circumstances should they go to rallies or organize any actions, this is their traditional preventive work, but this time we see that it has been somewhat intensified. Perhaps this is due to the fact that the per
Given that ukraine is not a large country, compared to russia, different, a Different Number of inhabitants and a Different Number of those who can be mobilized into the army, is it necessary to continue in this war with these large mobilized armies, or is it Still Necessary move on to others. A stage that did not exist in the second world war, namely with the use of the latest weapons that the allies in the antiputin coalition can give us, or the Resource Base of these mobilized people decides everything now in your way . Yes, i think that it is necessary to mobilize without interruption, because there are always victims, so there must be soldiers who have passed the proper training, and accordingly, such people must go to the front, they must, we understand that it is not about the number, no, here we are actually talking about even and not about some new weapon, here we are talking about proper equipment, proper equipping of soldiers, in particular infantrymen, and so that they. Cor
Orban, and a guy like fice, well, what do you and i say about this to all actors, and they already have in their hands, too, and if not a nuclear baton , then the right of veto, like this hungarian corrupt official, well, if not the controlling voice in german society, then already more than 20 alternative for germany, and so on further, and the point is that i will emphasize this again, democracy is the best that exists today, but democracy must learn to defend itself, because then humanity pays very dearly for the fact that democracy sometimes cannot defend itself, and this applies, among other things, to the situation we are talking about we are talking to you, because ukrainians know that if in 2014, in the 13th year, forgive me for that , in the 13th year, everyone stood for ukraine, the full stop was already long ago, well, we are up to the 17th year explained that this is not a civil war. Sir, roman, benvoles, this is the former secretary of defense of great britain, in the ze t
Of course, yes, because we are talking about the needs that ukraine has, and because when we say, that Great Britain has been providing weapons for a year and a half, accordingly, at a certain stage we understand that those stocks that were in warehouses just for. Are running out, sir colonel, can we say that russia has been methodically and for decades preparing for a major attack on ukraine and has been accumulating a large number of weapons in its stockpiles since the time of the soviet union, and this makes it easier for them in the current war, so much more than for the countries of the west, who helped us now. Because no one in the west thought that there could be a war of this magnitude, a war that is the biggest since world war ii on the european continent . Such a broad question, there are so many such tricks, i want to say that you are absolutely right , they did not spend and did not sell to the countries of africa or the countries of the near east, of course, we understand