allow due process, no one s rights are trampled, but the ability to go to court, obtain an order and collect not only the fire arms but any any weapons in the possession well, why not take the fire arms first and then go to court because that s another system because a lot of times by the time you go to court it takes so long to go to court to get the due process procedures, i like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man s case, so you could do exactly what you re saying but take the guns first, go through due process second. joe and pat, what are you doing about the 18 to 21? a handgun, you can t buy one, you have to wait till you re 21 but you can buy the kind of weapon used in the school shooting at 18. i think there s something else to think about so i m curious as to what you did in your bill. we didn t address it, mr. preside president. because you re afraid of the
going. i respect people for going, but it s not just lucy and the football or pull being away the fishing rod. the man is kind of a pathological liar. and you can t trust anything he s saying. i think he s convinced by the last thing he heard. i m going to play this clip. the counter factual game. if obama had said this. this is an exchange about taking guns away, take a listen. allow due process, so no one s rights are trampled, but the ability to go to court, obtain an order and collect not only the firearms but any, any weapons in the or take the firearms first and then go to court. because that s another system, because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court to get the due process procedures, i like taking the guns early, so you could do exactly what you re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.
go through due process second. we think about the tragedy in sandy hook. that s right. and adam lanza s mother, who spoke to law enforcement, spoke to local officials. she was concerned over and over again. i know you are from connecticut and live this had and saw this. give families and to take action to remove those weapons for a set period of time or longer. make that s a state law provision. people are working on what we can do continue to cent vise states to do this. it brings home this point. the vice president alluded to it and congressman rutherford touched on it. there are people who tried to do something. they called the fbi, the sheriff s office but legally
go to court, to get the due process procedures, take the guns first, go through due process second. what do you make of that? the third time i m going to say extraordinary. that s a very extraordinary statement. it s a little bill of a piece with lots of a little bit of a piece with lots of things this president says. he either doesn t know about, doesn t like, or can t abide process. he likes to see results. so whether you re talking about how to handle the nunez memo or how to handle the russia investigation or even whether you talk about how he s praised how other people in other countries like duterte in the philippines has engaged in extra judicial killings in connection with the war on drugs in that country, he likes to show that you re taking strong action. the problem is we do have a constitution, we have a process for doing things and investigating cases, and even doing something that some people on the other side of the gun debate might not necessarily disagree with. yo
no one is arguing this will save lives. there is no research that it will. as propaganda and its sneaky propaganda. an incremental step toward mark on restriction. then yesterday, the president went further. he want to talk to gun control. he went after republicans, suggesting they are puppets of the nra. at one point, he said the government should take the guns first, go through due process second. how honest do you want to be? imagine if barack obama had said that. just ignore due process and confiscate guns. obama would have been denounced as a dictator. we would have denounced him first, trust me. congress will be talking impeachment, some will be muttering about secession. the media agreed with the president said to so they have underplayed it or presented it as a battle between the president and the nra. it s not about the nra come it s not even about the president. it s about the constitution and the constitution remains the same no matter who s in power. that s the point of t