Him through this committee for eight months. So i think following proceed sure is something that you have to look at because your idea is not really point of order. The time has expired. If he wishes. He doesnt wish. Good morning, mr mr. Lewandowski. Im questioning you right now. Thank you. The president asked you who had no role at all in the white house to deliver that message to Attorney General sessions. The president could have just picked up the phone himself at any time and called the Attorney General. The president also had a full staff of executive employees right down the hall. So this made me wonder. The president thought what he was doing was legal, why didnt he just pick up the phone and
call Attorney General sessions, or why not ask any member of his staff who worked right down the hall to deliver a message . It is clear to me that the reason he went to you, mr. Lewandowski, is because everyone said no. So i want to ask you about that. Two days before meeting you, the pre
you re welcome to be stalling. i m not gonna stall. answer the question yes or no. did he tell you nobody at the white house was supposed to contact the attorney general about the investigation? that you can answer yes or no. i will not disclose any conversation i had with the president. again, you are here to block any reasonable inquiry into the truth or not of this administration. the white house counsel s quote, shortly after sessions accused his recusal directed that sessions should not be contacted about the special counsel s investigation. in fact, the white house counsel s internal note states no contact with sessions and no communication serious about instruction. can you read that? i just said it. can you read that. did you hear me? yes, is there a question? did the president tell you, as white house counsel told him, no contact with sessions because of serious concerns of obstruction when he asked you to deliver a message to sessions? i m respecting the executive