The assessment of the republican memo . Guest after all of that sound and fury, i think the release of the memo was a bit anticlimactic. The memo really doesnt include much beyond what was already leak doubt. There are the questions about the provenance of the steel dossier. The goal of the memo is to provide the proof that the investigation by mueller is or the Deputy Attorney general rosenstein is somehow ultimately part of this controversy. I think it failed on both accounts. Folks are still going to accept it as a Conspiracy Theory perpetuated, but the fact the conversation has moved on to other possible problems. The memo did not really do the work that i think its authors wanted to do. Host do you think it was the narrow perspective of how this fisa court words and what information it takes to get someone to be investigated under fisa . There is a lot of public misinformation about the court. But also about the war and process generally. A lot of folks look at the facts that Mich
Washington journal, what is next after the release of the House Intelligence Committee memo. First, were from university of texas law and also a Judicial Watch. Host the House Intelligence Committee meets at 5 00 to consider if they will release the democratic response released by republicans last week. If they do, the white house would he given five days to object. It will gojects it, to the house for a vote. Trump said the release of the memo vindicates him in the investigation being conducted by Robert Mueller. Several republicans disagree. For our next hour, we want to get your thoughts on if you agree with the president possible assessment on the release of the memo. Heres how you can let us know. Republicans, 202 7488001. Democrats, 202 7488000. Independents, 202 7488002. You can post thoughts on twitter, cspanwj. On our twitter page twitter. Com cspanwj. The memo, from the president , it totally vindicates the president in the probe, but the witchhunt goes on and on. Collusion a
That either the entire investigation by special counsel bob mueller is tainted or that Deputy Attorney general ubenstein rosenstein is part of this controversy, honestly, i think it failed on both accounts. Alks can accept it as Conspiracy Theory perpetuated meme, but the memo did not really do the work that its patrons and authors wanted it to do. The neverit perspective of how this fisa court works and what information it takes to actually get someone to be investigated under fisa . Guest part of the problem is there is a whole lot of public misinformation about the fisa court specifically but also about the war and process generally. A lot of folks look at the fact that Michael Steele may or may not have been paid by the Democratic National committee and assumed that taint everything he says. Pedro, ordinary Law Enforcement witnesses are often paid informants. Not prove that any warrants the government obtains from that information is tainted. In fact, more often than not, it is not
Is also part of this controversy. I think it failed on both accounts. Foods are going to accept it as a Conspiracy Theory that the conversation has moved on to other problems shows the memo did not do the work that they thought they wanted it to do. To think its the narrow perspective of how the fisa court works and what it takes to get them investigated. Theres public misinformation about the fisa court. Think a lot of folks look at the fact that carter page on star Michael Steele may or may not have been paid by the Democratic National committee and assume that means everything he says. Ordinary witnesses are often paid informants. Such is not prove that information is tainted. Thats why the real question is what is a memo say, question is what was submitted to the fisa court. Was there enough independent inc. Information. Host their way to release that underline information that doesnt Compromise National Security . We could try. The call is up to the president. He has the final say
Illiterate adult negative up literary agent to Cynthia Canal in the work for making all this possible and all my teachers just to be here tonight. Thank you so much for coming. I really appreciated. [applause] the author of sagebrush rebel. [applause] when it came to energy, Natural Resources and the environment, reagan knew exactly what he wanted to do. Of course, he wanted to be governor of california and like the other than western states it is a federally and state the government does own onethird of the nation most of that with the American West california, colorado, half of it was owned by the federal government. Said to be governor of california not just when it was sovereign but also as a land owner event in many of the cases bad. He had that experience through the park service and fish and Wildlife Service and bureau of reclamation he had experience with those agencies and he brought that knowledge with him in the years ahead. Something about reagin is he had a photographic me