investigation is about. the investigation is about whether or not the company misled the government in which democratic congresswoman degette is quoted today saying i think i was misled in july they told me this. six weeks later they laid off 1100 employees and went bankrupt. so the reason they put out the money yesterday is because it was use it or lose it. fiscal year ends tomorrow. the problem for them is they have a perception problem. everybody at the highest levels including larry summers said the process for approving the loan is not good enough but they didn t stop and change it. eric: that isn t the problem. they sucked at giving loans. nothing illegal about that. if it is a bundleer, that s not it. if they sold this because pelosi s brother-in-law was on the board dana: it s not fair to color him with that yet. eric: we do know that. kimberly: the fact of the
this and that. i don t know if the prosecutors office in this company doesn t leak. stop indicting people before it happens. eric: it s under congressional investigation, ethics investigation because her husband owned stock in a company, bank that got tarp money. what is the difference if nancy pelosi s brother-in-law owned stock in solar reserve? bob: or the difference between your buddies in wall street should have gone to jail and are sitting on boats. eric: we re not talking about that. bob: we are. all the bums that got bailed out and you pick out somebody in congress when the wall street bums ought to be in jail. eric: get a loan based on who you know whether or not dana: i don t think it s fair. we don t know about that guy in particular. bob: you sound like a grand jury indicting the people. eric: we are cutting pelosi slack and her brother-in-law slack now because we re not sure if the obama administration knew -
i don t know if the prosecutors office in this company doesn t leak. stop indicting people before it happens. eric: it s under congressional investigation, ethics investigation because her husband owned stock in a company, bank that got tarp money. what is the difference if nancy pelosi s brother-in-law owned stock in solar reserve? bob: or the difference between your buddies in wall street should have gone to jail and are sitting on boats. eric: we re not talking about that. bob: we are. all the bums that got bailed out and you pick out somebody in congress when the wall street bums ought to be in jail. eric: get a loan based on who you know whether or not dana: i don t think it s fair. we don t know about that guy in particular. bob: you sound like a grand jury indicting the people. eric: we are cutting pelosi slack and her brother-in-law slack now because we re not sure if the obama administration knew -
investigation is about. the investigation is about whether or not the company misled the government in which democratic congresswoman degette is quoted today saying i think i was misled in july they told me this. six weeks later they laid off 1100 employees and went bankrupt. so the reason they put out the money yesterday is because it was use it or lose it. fiscal year ends tomorrow. the problem for them is they have a perception problem. everybody at the highest levels including larry summers said the process for approving the loan is not good enough but they didn t stop and change it. eric: that isn t the problem. they sucked at giving loans. nothing illegal about that. if it is a bundleer, that s not it. if they sold this because pelosi s brother-in-law was on the board dana: it s not fair to color him with that yet. eric: we do know that. kimberly: the fact of the
what an insult to american taxpayers to spend the money that way. two more solar companies one $757 million went to company called solar reserve. solar reserve, one of the investors in solar reserve through another vehicle. none other than ron pelosi, nancy pelosi s brother-in-law. getting taxpayer money $787 million. dana: so they have a conception problem. crony capitalism is not illegal. it happens and has been happening for decades, maybe centuries. the problem is this. one of the most popular magazine had a piece that said new e-mails are coming out tomorrow from the white house but it doesn t show there is special favoritism. that is not what the