she lost her husband in combat when her youngest was three weeks old. these families have given up everything for us and i hope before people go out and celebrate, which i think today needs to be a day of celebration. we are a free country and need to celebrate their service and what they have done and remember them. i hope they take time to dedicate to what today really is all about. todd: that spouse had a three year old, one year old and a three week old and then i just finished with that panel of gold-star parents and you heard us joking, not joking but talking about how stories hit harder when you are a parent. you are about to experience it and understand what that is and listening to cheryl rex, the mom we just interviewed saying what she s going to do today. go to the grave site of her son to be with him. just think about that for a moment and think about so many parents. regardless of the war, who got that call, got that telegram, that no parent wants to get. the c
patriotic hawaiian. of very fitting for memorial day. that s what s most important. that s where it starts amazing product. veterans want american-made. when we have an amazing mission like project k-9 hero that s why we do it at cost. ashley: jason, we were talking earlier about the medical costs for working dogs, the service dogs. and i didn t know i didn t realize, at least, that when they got out of the service, i mean, who is going to pay for them comes on the handler. not every handler is equipped. pat is trying to get education post army. we want to make sure no dog goes without. we don t want to see a veteran go in personal debt because there are no programs in place. after my service in the military in government supervisors and the police force, i decided to starts this organization in 2016 we now have 233 dogs in the program. we are honored protecting those who protected us. ashley: 233 dogs. it takes a lot to fund that. absolutely. how much you were saying was i
houston down in australia. again, china being china, they still have to answer to their government supervisors or bosses so it doesn t surprise me that it did this but the expected out come is what happened. now that you don t report it directly to the command of the investigation, you ve got this game of telephone, you ve got the we the theys and you have people, one, doubting your data. this could be the best break in the whole case but now people doubt it because they didn t follow through the joint task force command structure and time is being lost, time is being wasted. if they had put it through the command structure, the ships would be on the way, additional pinger locations and change the location of others and get there. so hopefully it s all right. hopefully going forward they can work a little better with the joint task force. unfortunately it does sound like business as usual with reporting to beijing first. michael kay, retired lieutenant colonel. two things. first of a
airports that tried where it didn t come out any worse but not so good. look, if you look into what a lot of the aviation experts have to say, basically what they tell us is it s a nicer wrapper around the same product. you still have government supervisors, identical technology, identical procedures, they don t seem to think it s going to save us that much money. so, just a question of whose pocket the paycheck is coming out of. it s not only saving, it s improving efficiency. privatization bet center hand it to the airlines. if american airlines doesn t protect its passengers it goes out of business. if the tsa doesn t protect the passengers it gets more funding. we have an incentive problem. in the private sector you are forced to do better. in the government you are rewarded. bill, do incentives matter here as they do most places? maybe but i say no, don t give privatization a bad name by