Totally being reconsidered and relooked at as you imagine by the Mayors Office they have not put out instructions yet about any actual cuts that we need to make. This fiscal year or how it would roll into next fiscal year. We expect that to happen sometime around christmas and i hope i can come to you in january to give you information on what our instructions are. If the reduction exceeds the savings we are going to have to do a major reallocation of our expenses. That is a concern and its as i mentioned to senior staff and others its a tight budget this year. We knew that going in after we went through the budget analyst process and we have to be really cognizant of that. But that doesnt mean we cant in next years budget propose things that are really necessary in order for the department to continue operating in a way that is it needs to be for our employers. Any questions . What is the amount . Approximately 50,000. Its about 46 or Something Like that. So your 50,000 is 50,000 is y
Approve recommendations to the board. The meeting was on november 9th. How much you would like me to repeat here. There were 9 recommendations as action items we can take in going forward. Would you like me to read those off or should we just im going to assume the commissioners have read them . Yes. I move we approve these recommendations. Is there a second. Second. Great, any questions, comments in just an objects observation and comment. Some of these have a multilayer issues behind them. It would be the Governments Committee to go back with details that might support one or more of these steps. Its not more like these are the nine things we are going to do. I wanted to put that clearly in the record. I have made a motion in the committee to send the full committee forward risking in a public forum says this is the plan of action for the next two 2 years. It is not the case. Its rather that this directionally sets out to where we are going and we would bring these back for further d
Were 9 recommendations as action items we can take in going forward. Would you like me to read those off or should we just im going to assume the commissioners have read them . Yes. I move we approve these recommendations. Is there a second. Second. Great, any questions, comments in just an objects observation and comment. Some of these have a multilayer issues behind them. It would be the Governments Committee to go back with details that might support one or more of these steps. Its not more like these are the nine things we are going to do. I wanted to put that clearly in the record. I have made a motion in the committee to send the full committee forward risking in a public forum says this is the plan of action for the next two 2 years. It is not the case. Its rather that this directionally sets out to where we are going and we would bring these back for further discussion. There were a couple there that were also noted on our last evaluation two 2 years ago which we hadnt changed.
The general fund statements we just presented from 92. 8 million as of june 30, 2014 , we are projecting to have it increased to 81. 1 million. The general Fund Administrative budget, this is three 3 months is very difficult doing projections because a lot of the expenses are not things that are allocated across 112 every month. Right now we are projecting a balance of 50,000 for the yearend. We have staffed up and we continue to staff up. We have obligations for contracts that we need to meet and then the big unknown is with the passage of prop b that wasnt considered in the mayors budget because it was placed on the ballot after the mayor and the board finished the 1415 budget. So that is a whole. It was estimated a couple months ago as 20 million shortfall to the general fund. Initially that was allocated to department based on a formula of 1. 5 percent of the general fund budget. However, that is totally being reconsidered and relooked at as you imagine by the Mayors Office they ha
Over a period of time or over a broad range of companies and perhaps maybe its only successful once. Nobody wants to be patient zero, but we can reduce the outcome of that. It dramatically increases the cost for a successful attack and it limits the number of actors who can do that and a lot of good things will occur from that. So sharing is absolutely critical and were seeing more and more of it. There are a lot of acronyms flying around, but i think its the nature of getting public sharing. Ctic is a perfect example of that having publictopublic sharing, and then you have ntic. The public to private sharing is extremely helpful. And at the private level, there is lots of privatetoprivate sharing going on. The fsi sac has been incredibly successful for some time. One of the things im very happy about is the Security Industry coming together to do Something Like that. About six months ago ourselves semantec announced something called the thread alliance, which is security competitors c