Page 9 - Gps Data News Today

Wasnt on it, and then ten witnesses testified that was his voice. finally, he sat there listening to all that testimony and figure, he better get on that stand and say, okay. thats me i think also that 9-1-1 call was really important, we did hear a little clip of it in that story. thats important because -- a long time law partner alec murdaugh, you hear him on the 9-1-1 call. you hear him on there saying i check them both. i check their pulse, he says that later to investigators. mark ball, a f...

Listening to all that testimony, he figured he better get on that stand and say, okay, thats me. i think also that 911 call was really important. we heard a clip of it in that story. and thats important because mark ball, a longtime law partner of alex murdaughs, you hear him on the 911 call, alex murdaugh saying, "i checked them both, i checked their pulse." he says that later to investigators. mark ball, a friend, a fellow law partner, testified murdaugh kept changing his story. one day he che...

One of things complain ed about was the phone would have had her gps data if they processed it within five days. and because they didnt, the gps data got overridden. it would have been helpful. fingerprints, footprints, all things that werent done so hes entitled to his opinion. ten days well be filing an appeal. >> youre listening to defense attorneys for alex murdaugh who was sentenced to spend the rest of his life behind bars for murdering his wife and son. diane gallagher is on the scene for...

Alex, fingerprints and footprints. they broszed it within five days? because they didnt, the gps data got overwritten, which would have been helpful to alex and fingerprints and footprints and all kinds of forensic things were not done. >> what do you make of the judges comment after the verdict? >> hes entitled to his opinion. >> did you expect to appeal any time soon? >> ten days before we file an appeal. >> what did you say? >> what do you believe the strongest round of deals are? >> the fina...

At the minimum. they had none of it here. it gives us the ability of voir dire jurors and the prosecution didnt want that. i dont disagree -- if i was pros prosecuting this case, i probably would not brought it. what we heard was presented by detective owen, blood spatter didnt exist and testimonies of the gun is wrong. sleds needs to do some self-examination. one of the things we complained about was maggies phone would have had all her gps data on it if they processed it for five days. the gps...

Prove alex threw the phone out when he went by there and they have no evidence of that. the evidence is the contrary. he did not. evidence supports everything that he said from the day he had that interview or the couple of days. you get onstar data, you get gps data and my gps data and you will know im not traveling with her phone. never got it, rode over it and now we have a guy tossing a phone in an office doesnt work for sled. not every expert says that. thats not his area of expertise. so l...

Perhaps, then i do think as manu noted theres going to be a lot of pressure on kevin mccarthy on whether or not that requires additional action. >> jeff zeleny, i see youre over at cpac right now, one of two high-profile republican gatherings taking place this week. what does the list of speakers reveal to you about this growing rift were sensing within the republican party? >> wolf, you know cpac is an annual event. but certainly every four years right before the presidential election its a rit...

Like most veterans, im a huge believer in diplomacy because i understand the costs of war when diplomacy fails. and you just cant substitute going face to face. we have to talk with our adversaries. thats exactly what blinken is doing. >> you say that by ruling out f-16 fighter jets to ukraine at least for now president biden is signaling to russia he doesnt want this war to escalate. but by not providing fighter jets is the u.s. essentially allowing putin to draw a red line? >> no, i dont think...

Which was to have someone try to kill him so that his son buster could recover insurance proceeds. i think thats a very powerful argument for any juror sitting there having a hard time believing that this man is so monstrous that he would kill his wife and his son. heres an alternative theory. yes, he may have done something crazy, but that crazy was to try to kill himself, hire a hit man who turned out to be like a distant cousin to try to kill himself rather than kill the people that he loved ...

0 fraud he had been committing for years, the defense pointing out that doesnt make any sense, all that did was landed him in law enforcements focus. so, what we see here is the defense trying to eat away at the prosecutions case. they did that earlier by attacking forensic evidence. they spent a lot of time talking about blood splatter evidence and why that might not be a reliable indicator of guilt. and while the prosecution has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution, i...