went to jail. i think that may come back to haunt him. when you are giving advice it depends on the advice you were giving. joe and ed, a pleasure to talk to you both. good to be with you. about 11 minutes away from the next wave of runners who head out on their 26.2 miles and 11 minutes from happening now and jenna lee as a preview. we will continue your terrific coverage from boston and follow the marathon with live reports. and echoes of the cold war as we get a better idea of the policy. questions surface whether it is the race policy. and they are taking down plane seat sizes and two interesting
paved way for what follows. government enforcing the will of the people by enshrining that expanded equality into law. it s what the supreme court s decision on affirmative action this week is part of why it was so disheartening. you see, the justices sent a case back to the texas paste court, with orders to reconsider the ut austin admissions process under a strict standard that could put the program in jeopardy and open the door for future challenges that could end affirmative action altogether. which could ultimately close the door on the kind of progressive momentum around race policy that we witnessed this week around marriage equality. where else do we find those faces among unfamiliar identities than in diverse college classrooms enabled and created by affirmative action. so i want us to talk about this affirmative action thing, but i also don t want us to lose vra, because they feel connected. let s go back to the texas voter i.d. issue, which has been put central in the deba